ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Analysis of the Effectiveness of a Technological Solution to Simultaneously Mitigate Soil Degradation and Control the Infestation of Invasive Plants
More details
Hide details
1
Environmental Engineering, São Paulo State University - Unesp - Institute of Sciences and Technology of Sorocaba, Brazil
These authors had equal contribution to this work
Submission date: 2024-03-27
Final revision date: 2024-08-05
Acceptance date: 2024-08-08
Online publication date: 2024-10-18
Publication date: 2024-10-18
Corresponding author
Alexandre Marco da Silva
Environmental Engineering, São Paulo State University - Unesp - Institute of Sciences and Technology of Sorocaba, Brazil
Civil and Environmental Engineering Reports 2024;34(4):94-112
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
Geotextile-based products have been considered as an adequate alternative to mitigate soil degradation processes, either by erosion or invasion by weeds. Thus, we assessed the efficiency of a bag confectioned with jute fabric and filled with mowed grass. We constructed six experimental plots considering two experimental conditions - three with the control (uncovered) and three covered with the product we generated (jute bag). We conducted the study during a rainy period and analyzed the efficiency of the product using the indicators: soil-chemical balance (including organic matter), soil-water repellence (hydrophobicity), changes in the microtopography of the plots, and emergence and growth of plants. We identified that within the study period, the engineered product provided effective protection to the soil surface, mitigating erosion processes, as well as delaying the rise of weeds (21% reduction). The soil’s chemical and physical indicators evidenced that the soil was moderately improved. In this way, we argue that the product presents sufficient conditions to be an economically accessible alternative to control the soil degradation processes since it is simple and rapid to be manufactured and it uses materials that were initially considered waste, therefore being ecologically correct and interesting.
REFERENCES (43)
1.
Nayakekorale, HB 2020. Soil Degradation. In: The Soils of Sri Lanka: World Soils Book Series. 1st ed. Switzerland: Springer Nature: 103-118.
2.
Slenicka, P, Zouhar, J, Molnarova, KJ et al. 2020. Trends of soil degradation: Does the socio-economic status of landowners and land users matter? Land Use Policy 95, 1-8.
3.
Wolfe, BE and Klironomos, JN 2005. Breaking new ground: soil communities and exotic plant invasion. Bioscience 55, 477-487.
4.
Singh T, Choudhary, A and Kaur, S 2023. Weeds can help in biodiversity and soil conservation. Indian Journal of Weed Science 55, 133–140.
5.
Wallace, KJ, Laughlin, DC and Clarkson, BD 2017. Exotic weeds and fluctuating microclimate can constrain native plant regeneration in urban forest restoration. Ecological Applications 27, 1268-1279.
6.
Rao, VS 2000. Principles of weed science. CRC Press, 2nd edition.
7.
USDA (United States Department of Agriculture) 2015. Soil Quality Indicators: Chemical Indicators and Soil Functions. Factsheet. See
https://www.nrcs.usda.gov/site....
8.
Stefanoski, DC, Figueiredo, CCD, Santos, GG and Marchão, RL 2016. Selecting soil quality indicators for different soil management systems in the Brazilian Cerrado. Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira 51, 1643-1651.
9.
Dumanski, J and Pieri, C 2009. Land Quality Indicators (LQI): Monitoring and Evaluation. In: Land Use, Land Cover and Soil Sciences-Volume II: Land Evaluation, Oxford, UK, 160.
10.
Nuñez, MA, Chiuffo, MC, Torres, A et al. 2017. Ecology and management of invasive Pinaceae around the world: progress and challenges. Biological Invasions 19, 3099-3120.
11.
Badía, D, López-Garcia, S, Martí, C et al. 2017. Burn effects on soil properties associated to heat transfer under contrasting moisture content. Science of the Total Environment 601-602, 1119-1128.
12.
Hagner, M, Mikola, J, Saloniemi, I et al. 2019. Effects of glyphosate-based herbicide on soil animal trophic groups and associated ecosystem functioning in a northern agricultural field. Scientific Reports 9, 13.
13.
Lal, R, Blum, WE, Valentin, C and Stewart, BA 2019. Methods for Assessment of Soil Degradation. CRC press. Ed 1, Florida, USA.
14.
Chmura, D, Salachna, A, Broda, J et al 2022. Multifunctional Geotextiles Produced from Reclaimed Fibres and Their Role in Ecological Engineering. Materials 15, 7957.
15.
Mohamed, WW, Osman, N and Abdullah, R 2022. A review of bioengineering techniques for slope stability in Malaysia. International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology 20, 1-16.
16.
Shalchian, MM and Arabani, M 2022. A Review of soil reinforcement with planetary fibers. Journal of Soil Sciences and Plant Nutrition 22, 4496-4532.
17.
Nsiah, PK and Schaaf, W 2019. The potentials of biological geotextiles in erosion and sediment control during gold mine reclamation in Ghana. Journal of Soils and Sediment 19, 1995-2006.
18.
Wu, H, Yao, C, Li, C et al. 2020. Review of application and innovation of geotextiles in geotechnical engineering. Materials 13, 1774.
19.
Sun, Z, Wang, Y and Sun, L 2022. Effects of straw mulching on soil nutrient content and microbial community on the gentle slope arable land in dryland farming. Archives of Agronomy and Soil Sciences 69, 1-12.
20.
Tsuchiya, LH 2017. Effectiveness of the integrated use of two soil conservation and recovery techniques (mulch and hydroseeding): comparison of soil losses and soil organic matter dynamics. Monography (in Portuguese), São Paulo State University (UNESP), Institute of Science and Technology, Campus Sorocaba.
21.
Silva, AM, Tsuchiya, LH, Mendes, PB et al. 2019. Jute bioblanket as a soil rehabilitation strategy in Sorocaba, Brazil: Soil chemistry and SWOT approaches. Environmental Quality Management 29, 125-137.
22.
Bortoleto, LA, Rodgers, J and da Silva, AM 2022. Detecting and Restoring Gaps Among Forest Patches: AN Achievable and Replicable Proposal to Boost the Landscape Connectivity. Civil and Environmental Engineering Reports 32, 62-84.
24.
Raij, B van, Andrade, JC de, Cantarella, H and Quaggio, JA 2001. Análise Química para Avaliação da Fertilidade de Solos Tropicais. Instituto Agronômico de Campinas, Campinas, 285 p.
25.
Silva, AM, Moradi, E, Rodrigo-Comino, J and Cerdà, A 2019. Spatial variability of soil roughness in persimmon plantations: A new combined ISUM (improved stock unearthing method) approach. Ecological Indicators 106, 105528.
26.
Guangren, S 2014. Kriging. In: Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery for Geoscientists. Elsevier. 238-274.
27.
Doerr, SH, Shakesby, RA and Walsh, R 2000. Soil water repellency: its causes, characteristics, and hydro-geomorphological significance. Earth-Sciences Reviews 51, 33-65.
28.
Bisdom, EBA, Dekker, LW and Schoutte JFT 1993. Water repellency of sieve fractions from sandy soils and relationships with organic material and soil structure. Geoderma 56, 105-118.
29.
Prescott, CE and Vesterdal, L 2021. Decomposition and transformations along the continuum from litter to soil organic matter in forest soils. Forest Ecology and Management 498, 119522.
30.
Ta, N, Zhang, C, Ding, H and Zhang, Q 2020. Effect of tillage, slope, and rainfall on soil surface microtopography quantified by geostatistical and fractal indexes during sheet erosion. Open Geosciences 12, 32-241.
31.
Pereira, LC, Balbinot, L, Matus, GN et al. 2022. Aspects of forest restoration and hydrology: linking passive restoration and soil–water recovery in Brazilian Cerrado. Journal of Forestry Research 5, 1-11.
32.
Beven, K and Germann, P 2013. Macropores and water flow in soils revisited. Water Resources Research 49, 3071-3092.
33.
Sanyal, T 2017. Jute, Jute Fiber, and Jute Yarn. In: Jute Geotextiles and their Applications in Civil Engineering. 1st ed. Singapore: Springer Nature: 7-17.
34.
Carneiro, RFV, Júnior, FMC, Pereira, LF et al. 2012. Fungos micorrízicos arbusculares como indicadores da recuperação de áreas degradadas no Nordeste do Brasil. Revista Ciência Agronômica 43, 648-657.
35.
Diatta, AA, Fike, JH, Battaglia, ML et al. 2020. Effects of biochar on soil fertility and crop productivity in arid regions: a review. Arabian Journal of Geosciences 13, 1-17.
36.
Romeo, F, Marzilliano, PA, Turríon, MB, and Muscolo, A 2020. Short-term effects of different fire severities on soil properties and Pinus halepensis regeneration. Journal of Forestry Research 31, 1271-1282.
37.
El-Beltagi, HS, Basit, A, Mohamed HI et al. 2022. Mulching as a sustainable water and soil saving practice in agriculture: A review. Agronomy 12, 1881.
38.
Moura, AS 2018. Hydrophobicity in sandy and clayey soils under different uses in the semi-arid region of Pernambuco. Dissertation (in Portuguese), Federal Rural University of Pernambuco, Garanhuns Academic Unit, Garanhuns, Pernambuco, Brazil.
39.
Huang, J and Hartemink, AE 2020. Soil and environmental issues in sandy soils. Earth-Sciences Reviews 208, 103295.
40.
Hermansen, C, Moldrup, P, Müller, K et al. 2019. Organic carbon content control the severity of water repellency and the critical moisture level across New Zealand pasture soils. Geoderma 338, 281-290.
41.
Movasat, M and Tomac, I 2021. Assessment of physical properties of water-repellent soils. Journal of Geotechnic and Geoenvironment 147, 06021010.
42.
Maia, CMBF, Dedecek, R and Malucelli, CS 2005. Identificação de Repelência à Água em Solos sob Plantios Florestais. Colombo, PR, Embrapa Florestas. Technical Report 147, 1-6.
43.
Vasic, V, Konstantinovic, B and Orlovic S 2012. Weeds in forestry and possibilities of their control. In: Weed control. IntechOpen 147-170.