ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Cause-and-effect Analysis of Anthropogenic and Natural Aspects in the Process of Assessing the Material Heritage Resource in Underground Mining Adaptation Planning
More details
Hide details
1
Faculty of Civil Engineering and Resource Management, Department of Geomechanics, Civil Engineering and Geotechnics, AGH University of Krakow, Poland
These authors had equal contribution to this work
Submission date: 2024-04-05
Final revision date: 2024-11-05
Acceptance date: 2024-11-15
Online publication date: 2024-12-01
Publication date: 2024-12-01
Corresponding author
Aleksandra Radziejowska
Faculty of Civil Engineering and Resource Management, Department of Geomechanics, Civil Engineering and Geotechnics, AGH University of Krakow, Poland
Civil and Environmental Engineering Reports 2024;34(4):449-461
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
The ongoing energy transformation requires legal and economic intervention by the Polish government to phase out unprofitable mining enterprises, especially in the coal mining sector. The poorly executed process mentioned above may lead not only to environmental degradation but also to social problems (rupture of interpersonal relationships, elimination of traditions, eradication of cultural behaviors). Therefore, an effective solution to this problem may be the adaptation of the aforementioned facilities for tourism purposes. These facilities have significant potential related to mining heritage and geodiversity. The article defines basic criteria related to mining heritage and examines the cause-and-effect relationships using the DEMATEL method. The outcome of this process will be an attempt to develop requirements for anthropogenic intervention in underground excavations in interaction with the preservation of cultural, material, and geodiversity heritage (master plan).
REFERENCES (23)
1.
Wieja, T, Chmura, J and Bartos, M 2015. Underground Tourist Routes in the Context of Sustainable Development. Archive Mining Science. vol. 60, no. 3, pp. 859–873.
2.
Heritage, I, Committee, S and C, Europe October, 2014. European Strategy for Promotion of Industrial Heritage. vol. 1924.
3.
Wieja, T 2019. Ochrona i adaptacja zabytkowych podziemnych wyrobisk [Protection and adaptation of historic underground structures]. Kraków: wydawnictwo AGH.
4.
Coupland, B and Coupland, N 2014. The authenticating discourses of mining heritage tourism in Cornwall and Wales, J. Socioling., vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 495–517.
5.
Conlin, MV and Jolliffe, L 2015. Mining heritage and tourism : a global synthesis. Routledge.
6.
Kaçar, AD 2016. Learning From the Ruhr: The Case of the World Heritage Site Zollverein as a Model of Conserving Industrial Culture in Turkey, Sayı Issue, vol. 19, no. 19, pp. 474–496.
7.
E, Commission and KOMAG 2023. Conservation and promotion of the Coal Mining Heritage as Europe ’ s cultural legacy Successful stories of transforming coal mining sites and areas into industrial heritage objects.
8.
Chmura, J and Wieja, T 2010. The adaptation of antique excavations into underground tourist routes the design and organization problems — Metodologia prac projektowych i organizacyjnych przy adaptacji zabytkowych wyrobisk na podziemne trasy turystyczne. Budownictwo Górnicze i Tunelowe. ISSN 1234-5342. no. R. 16 nr 3. pp. 73–82.
9.
Chmura, J and Wieja, T 2015. Synergia funkcji muzealnej i komercyjnej w projektowaniu podziemnych tras turystycznych — [Synergy museum and commercial functions in the design of underground routes tourist]. pp. 103–112.
10.
Szmygin, B 2009. Adaptacja Obiektów Zabytkowych Do Współczesnych Funkcji [Adaptation of Historic Buildings for Contemporary Functions].
11.
Rouba, BJ 2012. Wartościowanie w praktyce konserwatorskiej [Valuation in Conservation Practice]. Wartościowanie w Ochronie i Konserwacji Zabytków. p. 206.
12.
Rouba, BJ 2009. Dlaczego adaptacje niszczą zabytki i czy tak musi być? [Why do adaptations destroy monuments, and does it have to be that way?]. Adaptacja obiektów zabytkowych do współczesnych funkcji użytkowych. Politechnika Lubelska. Polski Komitet Narodowy Międzynarodowej Rady Ochrony Zabytków ICOMOS. W B. Szmyg., Warszawa – Lublin, p. 144.
13.
Ustawa o ochronie zabytków i opiece nad zabytkami [The Act on the Protection of Monuments and Heritage Care]. no. 162. 2003. pp. 3–5.
14.
Zalasińska, K and Zeidler, K 2012. Problematyka wartościowania jako podstawy rozstrzygnięć wojewódzkiego konserwatora zabytków [The Issue of Valuation as the Basis for Decisions of the Provincial Conservator of Monuments]. Wartościowanie w ochronie i konserwacji zabytków. praca zbiorowa, Pod red. B., Warszawa – Lublin.
15.
TICCIH. “The Nizhny Tagil Charter for the Industrial Heritage, The International Committee for the Conservation of Industrial Heritage. dostęp: 27.03.2023, 2003.
16.
UNESCO 2012. Wytyczne operacyjne do realizacji Konwencji Światowego Dziedzictwa.
17.
Affelt, W 2009. Dziedzictwo techniki, jego różnorodności wartości [Inheritance of technology, its diverse values]. Kurier Konserwatorski. vol. 5, pp. 5–20.
18.
Dytczak, M et al. 2011. Application potential of DEMATEL method and its extensions for analysis of decision problems in civil engineering. Civil Environment Engineering. vol. 2. pp. 235–240.
19.
Si S L et al. 2018. “DEMATEL Technique: A Systematic Review of the State-of-the-Art Literature on Methodologies and Applications. Mathematical Problems in Engineering. Hindawi Limited.
20.
Shieh, JI et al. Apr. 2010. A DEMATEL method in identifying key success factors of hospital service quality. Knowledge-Based Systems. vol. 23, no. 3. pp. 277–282.
21.
Kijewska, K et al. 2018. Application of AHP and DEMATEL Methods in Choosing and Analyzing the Measures for the Distribution of Goods in Szczecin Region. Sustainability. vol. 10. no. 7. pp. 1–26.
22.
Sobotka, A et al. 2021. Substitution of material solutions in the operating phase of a building. Applied Science. vol. 11. no. 6.
23.
Gabus, A and Fontela, E 1972. World Problems, An invitation to Further Thought Within Framework of DEMATEL. Geneva. Switzerland.