ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Contribution to the Study of Soil Stabilized by Ballast Columns
 
More details
Hide details
1
University 8 May 1945, Laboratory of Civil and Hydraulic Engineering (LGCH), Guelma, Algeria
 
 
Online publication date: 2020-11-09
 
 
Publication date: 2020-09-01
 
 
Civil and Environmental Engineering Reports 2020;30(3):234-252
 
KEYWORDS
ABSTRACT
Ballasted columns are an interesting technique for improving compressible soils in situ. Their major advantages are to reduce compaction, increase the bearing capacity of soils, accelerate consolidation, and eliminate the risks of liquefaction during earthquakes. Thanks to these advantages, reinforcement processes are considerably developed in the field of geotechnical construction and this is on an international scale. Numerical modelling is a necessary and effective alternative for approaching the real behavior of soils reinforced by ballasted columns. The present work aims to change several parameters, being, among others, the number of columns, the rise of the water table, and the friction angle. With this in mind, a parametric study was carried out in order to determine the influence of certain parameters on the settlement results and observe their influence on the mechanical behavior of the soil using the Plaxis 2D calculation code. This study found that the correct choice was based on the number of columns, which is three, while the increase in groundwater level does not have a significant influence on the results.
 
REFERENCES (18)
1.
Choobbasti, AJ, Zahmatkesh, A and Noorzad, R 2011. Performance of Stone Columns in Soft Clay: Numerical Evaluation. geotechnical and geologies engineering 29. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706....
 
2.
Alamgir, M, Miura, N, Poorooshasb and Madhav, M.R 1996. Deformation analysis of soft ground reinforced by columnar inclusions. Computer and Geotechnics 18, 267-290.
 
3.
Besançon, G, lorio, JP and Soyez, B 1984. Analysis of computational parameters involved in sizing ballast columns. Acts of the International Symposium: Strengthening the Soils and Rocks in Place 1, 119-126.
 
4.
Dhouib, A and Blondeau, F 2005. Colonnes Ballastées - implementation techniques, areas of application, behaviour, justification, control, research and development. Presse de L.C.P.C, France.
 
5.
Papeleux, P and Flipot, A 1970. Vibrocompaction electrodynamique de nodules frittes D’oxyde D’uraniun. Journal of Nuclear Materials 36, 275–287.
 
6.
Leonards, GA, Cutter, WA and Holtz, RD 1980. Dynamic compaction of granular soil. Journal Geotechnical Engineering 1, 35–44.
 
7.
Datye, KR 1982. Settlement and bearing capacity of foundation system with stone columns.C.R. Symposium on Soil and Rock Improvement Techniques Including Geotextiles, Reinforced Earth and Modern Piling Methods, AIT, Bangkok 1, A.1.1-A.1.27.
 
8.
Costet, J and Sanglerat, G 1969. Practical course in soil mechanics, Tome 2 (French). Dunod: Paris.
 
9.
Dhouib, A, Gambin, MP, Jacquemin, S and Soyez, B 1998. A new approach to the stability of embankments on soft soils treated with ballast columns (French), French Geotechnical Review 82,37-48.
 
10.
Aboshi, H, Ichimoto, E, Enoki M and Harada, K 1979. The “composer”, a method to improve characteristics of soft clay by inclusion of large diameter sand columns, C.R. International symposium. on soil building: Army Land and other methods 1, 211-216.
 
11.
Balaam, NP and Poulos, HG 1983. The behaviour of foundations supported by clays stabilized by stone columns. Proceeding of the 8th European Conference on Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering 1, 199-204.
 
12.
Documents Technical Unified, DTU 1992. Deep Foundation for the Chap.VIII Building: Ballast Columns (French), Paris.
 
13.
Zahmatkesh, A and Choobbast, AJ 2010. Settlement evaluation of soft clay reinforced with stone columns using the equivalent secant modulus. Arabian Journal of Geosciences 5, 103–109.
 
14.
Priebe, HJ 2005. Design of vibro replacement. Ground Engineering 38, 25-27.
 
15.
Recommendations of Ballast Column 2005. Recommendations on the design, calculation, execution and control of ballast columns under buildings and structures sensitive to settlement (French). French Geotechnical Review 111,3-16.
 
16.
Bretelle, S, Guilloux, A, Della Longa, Y and Zaghouani, K 2004. Improved soils by ballast columns under two large reservoirs GNL. ASEP-GI, ENPC/LCPC, 77-84.
 
17.
Dhouib, A, Soyez, B, Wehr, J and Priebe, HJ 2004.Method of Priebe: Origin, development and applications (French), Proceedings of the In ternational Symposium on Soil Improvement in Place. Edition Presses de l’ENPC- LCPC. Paris 1, 131-146.
 
18.
Akiyoshi, T, Fuchida K, Matsumoto, H, Hyodo, T and Fang, HL 1993. Liquefaction analyses of sandy ground improved by sand compaction piles. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering 12, 299–307.
 
eISSN:2450-8594
ISSN:2080-5187
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top