ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Effect of Variation of Operational Regimes in Building Environment on Results of its Energy and Exergy Assessments
 
More details
Hide details
1
National Technical University of Ukraine "Igor Sikorsky Kyiv Polytechnic Institute", Faculty of heat power engineering, Department of Nuclear Power Stations and Engineering Thermal Physics, Politehnichna st. 56, 03056 Kyiv, Ukraine
 
 
Online publication date: 2017-05-17
 
 
Publication date: 2017-03-28
 
 
Civil and Environmental Engineering Reports 2017;24(1):145-158
 
KEYWORDS
ABSTRACT
For further development of the dynamic exergy analysis within built environment the work proposes to take into account stochastic nature of variations of operational regimes. Using the probability theory and statistics methods, the set of parameters considered as relevant for uncertainty conditions are presented. It is shown that characteristics of buildings (insulation, window performance, heat recovery, etc.) and type of the heating system have undoubtedly a strong influence not only on the energy/exergy demand and consumption but also on the sensitivity of the energy/exergy parameters to variations of external conditions. According to the results obtained after implementations of energy efficient solutions coefficient of variation of energy/exergy-based parameters can be increased up to two times.
 
REFERENCES (8)
1.
Angelotti A., Caputo P.: The exergy approach for the evaluation of heating and cooling technologies; first results comparing steady state and dynamic simulations, in 2nd PALENC Conference and 28th AIVC Conference on Building Low Energy Cooling and Advanced Ventilation Technologies in the 21st Century (2007) Crete, Greece.
 
2.
IEA ECBCS Annex 49 Final Report - Low Exergy Systems for High- Performance Buildings and Communities - Detailed Exergy Assessment Guidebook for the Built Environment, edit. H. Torio and D. Schmidt, Fraunhofer IBP, Germany 2011.
 
3.
Angelotti A., Caputo P.: Dynamic exergy analysis of an air source heat pump, in International Conference on Exergy and Life Cycle Analysis. Nysiros (ELCAS) (2009) Nisyros, Greece.
 
4.
Angelotti A., Caputo C., Solaini G.: Steady versus dynamic exergy analysis: the case of an air source heat pump, Int. J. Exergy, 11, 4 (2012) 460-472.
 
5.
Sakulpipatsin P., van der Kooi H. J., Itard L. C. M., Boelman E. C.: The Influence of Possible Definitions of a Reference Environment to Determine the Exergy of Air in Buildings, Int. J. Exergy, 5, 3 (2008), 275-295.
 
6.
Jansen S.C., Luscuere P.G., Linden A.C. v.d.: Exergy Demand of Heating in Buildings - Steady State Versus Dynamic Approach, in 2nd International Exergy, Life Cycle Assessment and Sustainability Workshop & Symposium (ELCAS-2) (2011) Nisyros, Greece.
 
7.
Torío H.: Comparison and optimization of building energy supply systems through exergy analysis and its perspectives, Doctoral thesis, Technische Universitat Munchen 2012.
 
8.
Bejan A., Tsatsaronis G., Moran M.: Thermal Design and Optimization, New York, Wiley 1996.
 
eISSN:2450-8594
ISSN:2080-5187
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top