ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Experimental Studies of Hydraulic Losses and Carbon Dioxide Concentration in the Space Under the Face Mask Protecting Against COVID-19
 
More details
Hide details
1
Bialystok University of Technology, Faculty of Civil Engineering and Environmental Sciences, Department of HVAC Engineering, Poland
 
2
Institute of Environmental Engineering, Warsaw University of Life Sciences (SGGW), Poland
 
3
Bialystok University of Technology, Faculty of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Department of Geotechnics and Structural Mechanics, Poland
 
 
Online publication date: 2023-01-05
 
 
Publication date: 2022-12-01
 
 
Civil and Environmental Engineering Reports 2022;32(4):13-24
 
KEYWORDS
ABSTRACT
Masks are the primary tool used to prevent the spread of COVID-19 in the current pandemic. Tests were carried out to determine the total pressure drop through the materials from which the masks are made and the correlation of these results with the concentration of carbon dioxide in the inner space of the mask. The results showed that a parameter representing hydraulic losses of the mask material has a significant influence on the concentration of carbon dioxide in the inner space of the mask. Masks with higher hydraulic resistances accumulated a higher concentration of carbon dioxide, and generated greater fluctuations of carbon dioxide as a function of time, which may be caused by compensation of the respiratory system. For example, in a two-layer mask (mask no. 3) the hydraulic resistance values are about three times higher than in a single-layer mask (mask no. 1). The study also noticed that the inscriptions and prints placed on the masks increase the hydraulic resistance of the material from which the masks are made, which may also contribute to the accumulation of carbon dioxide in the space between the mask and the face. To reduce the accumulation of carbon dioxide within the inner space of the mask, the results of this work suggest searching for mask materials with the lowest possible hydraulic resistance.
REFERENCES (32)
1.
Awada, M, Becerik-Gerber, B, White, E, Hoque, S, O’Neill, Z, Pedrielli, G, Wen, J and Wu T 2022. Occupant health in buildings: Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the opinions of building professionals and implications on research. Building and Environment 207, Part A, 108440.
 
2.
Mamica, Ł, Głowacki, J and Makieła K 2021. Determinants of the energy poverty of polish students during the COVID-19 pandemic. Energies 14(11), 3233.
 
3.
Balocco, C and Leoncini L 2020. Energy cost for effective ventilation and air quality for healthy buildings: Plant proposals for a historic building school reopening in the covid-19 era. Sustainability 12(20), 8737, 1-16.
 
4.
 
5.
Marková, I, Tureková, I, Jad’ud’ová, J and Hroncová, E 2020. Analysis of hygrothermal microclimatic (Htm) parameters in specific food storage environments in slovakia. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 17(6), 2092.
 
6.
Tureková, I, Lukáčová, D and Bánesz G 2019. Lighting as an important factor of students’ work environment. International Journal of Engineering Pedagogy 9(1), 57-67.
 
7.
Park, D, Yoo, G-W, Park, S-H and Lee, J-H 2021. Assessment and calibration of a low-cost PM2.5 sensor using machine learning (hybridlSTM neural network): Feasibility study to build an air quality monitoring system. Atmosphere 12(10), 1306.
 
8.
Załuska, M and Gładyszewska-Fiedoruk, K 2020. Regression Model of PM2.5 Concentration in a Single-Family House. Sustainability 12(15), 5952.
 
9.
Kapalo, P, Sulewska, M and Adamski, M 2021. Examining the Interdependence of the Various Parameters of Indoor Air. Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering 100 LNCE, 150-157.
 
10.
Kapalo, P, Vilčeková, S, Mečiarová, L, Domnita, F and Adamski M 2020. Influence of indoor climate on employees in office buildings-A case study. Sustainability 12(14), 5569.
 
11.
Lu, Y, Dong, J, Wang, Z, Wang, Y, Wu, Q, Wang, L and Liu J 2021. Evaluation of stack ventilation in a large space using zonal simulation and a reduced-scale model experiment with particle image velocimetry. Journal of Building Engineering 34, 101958.
 
12.
Tureková, I, Marková, I, Sventeková, E and Harangózo, J 2022. Evaluation of microclimatic conditions during the teaching process in selected school premises. Slovak case study. Energy 239, 122161.
 
13.
Dzhevaga, N and Borisova, D 2021. Analysis of Air Monitoring System in Megacity on the Example of St. Petersburg. Journal of Ecological Engineering 22(4), 175–185.
 
14.
Petryk, A 2018. Epidemiology of Selected Diseases Related to Air Pollution in Krakow. Journal of Ecological Engineering 19(6), 124–131.
 
15.
Wang, C, Tavares, A, Fonseca, J, Soares, F and Li, Z 2021. Real-time condition assessment of a painted megalithic cave using Wireless Sensor Network. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology 104270.
 
16.
PN-EN 13779:2008 Ventilation for non-residential buildings. Performance requirements for ventilation and room-conditioning systems.
 
17.
EN 149 2001+A1:2010 Respiratory protective devices - Filtering half masks to protect against particles - Requirements, testing, marking.
 
18.
EN 14683:2019+AC:2019 Medical face masks - Requirements and test methods.
 
19.
Gładyszewska-Fiedoruk, K and Teleszewski, TJ 2020. Modelling of humidity in passenger cars equipped with mechanical ventilation. Energies 13(11), 2987.
 
20.
PN-EN 13141-5 Wentylacja budynków -- Badanie właściwości elementów/wyrobów do wentylacji mieszkań - Część 5: Nasady kominowe i wyrzutnie dachowe.
 
21.
CR 14378:2002 Ventilation for buildings - Experimental determination of mechanical energy loss coefficients of air handling components.
 
22.
Moffat, RJ 1989. Establishing the credibility of experimental work, Department of Mechanical Engineering. Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.
 
23.
Gładyszewska-Fiedoruk, K and Teleszewski, TJ 2022. Experimental studies of carbon dioxide concentration in the space under the face mask protecting against Covid-19 - Pilot studies. Journal of Environmental Health Science and Engineering. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40201....
 
24.
Geiss, O 2021. Effect of Wearing Face Masks on the Carbon Dioxide Concentration in the Breathing Zone, Special Issue on COVID-19 Aerosol Drivers. Aerosol and Air Quality Research, Impacts and Mitigation (X) 21(2).
 
25.
Roberge, RJ, Coca, A, Williams, W, Powell, J and Palmiero A. 2010. Physiological impact of the N95 filtering facepiece respirator on healthcare workers. Respiratory care 55, 569-77.
 
26.
Dattel, AR, O’Toole, N, Lopez, G and Byrnes KP 2020. Face mask effects of CO2, haert rate, respiration rate, and oxygen saturation on instructor pilots. The Collegiate Aviation Review-International 38, 1–11.
 
27.
Permentier, K, Vercammen, S, Soetaert, S and Schellemans C 2017. Carbon dioxide poisoning: Aliterature review of an often forgotten cause of intoxication in the emergency department. International Journal of Emergency Medicine 10, 17–20.
 
28.
Rivers, R.D and Murphy DJ Jr 2000. Air Filter Performance Under Variable Air Volume Conditions. AIVC #12,995, 4380 (RP-675).
 
29.
Sinkule, EJ, Powell, JB and Goss, FL 2013. Evaluation of N95 respirator use with a surgical mask cover: Effects on breathing resistance and inhaled carbon dioxide. Annals of Occupational Hygiene 57, 384–398.
 
30.
Zhu, JH, Lee, SJ, Wang, DY and Lee, HP 2016. Evaluation of rebreathed air in human nasal cavity with N95 respirator: a CFD study. Trauma and Emergency Care 1(2), 15-18.
 
31.
Mohan, S, Kundu, S, Ghoshal, K and Kumar, J 2021. Numerical study on two dimensional distribution of streamwise velocity in open channel turbulent flows with secondary current effect. Archives of Mechanics 73(2), 175–200.
 
32.
Szumbarski, J and Błoński, S 2011. Destabilization of a laminar flow in a rectangular channel by transversely-oriented wall corrugation. Archives of Mechanics 63(4), 393-428.
 
eISSN:2450-8594
ISSN:2080-5187
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top