ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Impact of Adding Biopreparations on the Anaerobic Co-Digestion of Sewage Sludge with Grease Trap Waste
 
More details
Hide details
1
Czestochowa University of Technology, Faculty of Infrastructure and Environment, Institute of Environmental Engineering, Brzeźnicka st. 60A, 42 -200 Częstochowa, Poland
 
 
Online publication date: 2016-10-21
 
 
Publication date: 2016-09-01
 
 
Civil and Environmental Engineering Reports 2016;22(3):167-179
 
KEYWORDS
ABSTRACT
The aim of the study was to evaluate the effect of using biopreparations on efficiency of the co-fermentation process. Commercial bacterial biopreparations DBC Plus Type L, DBC Plus Type R5 and yeast biopreparations were used in the study. The process of cofermentation of sewage sludge with grease trap waste from a production plant that manufactured methyl esters of fatty acids was analysed in the laboratory environment under mesophilic conditions. The sludge in the reactor was replaced once a day, with hydraulic retention time of 10 days. Grease trap waste accounted for 35%wt. of the fermentation mixture. The stabilization process was monitored everyday based on the measurements of biogas volume. Addition of yeast biopreparation to methane fermentation of sewage sludge with grease trap waste caused an increase in mean daily biogas production from 6.9 dm3 (control mixture) to 9.21dm3 (mixture M3). No differences in biogas production were found for other cases (mixtures M1, M2). A similar relationship was observed for methane content in biogas.
 
REFERENCES (22)
1.
Du Bois, E., Mercier, A., Energy recovery. In: Xu, C.C., Lancaster, J. (Eds.), Treatment of Secondary Sludge for Energy Recovery. Nova Science Publishers Inc., New York, 2009, 187-212.
 
2.
Carrere H., Dumas C., Battimelli A., Batstone D.J., Delgenes J.P., Steyer J.P., Ferrer I.,. Pretreatment methods to improve sludge anaerobic degradability: a review. Journal of Hazardous Materials. Vol. 183, Issues 1-3, 2010, pp. 1-15.
 
3.
Grosser A., Worwąg M., Neczaj E., Grobelak A., Semi-continous anaerobic co-digestion of mixed sewage sludge and waste fats of vegetable origin. Annual Set The Environment Protection, Vol.15 T.15 Part 3, 2013, s.2108-2125.
 
4.
Neczaj E., Grosser A., Worwąg M., Boosting Production of Methane from Sewage Sludge by Addition of Grease Trap Sludge. Environment Protection Engineering, Vol.39, nr 2, 2013, p.125-133.
 
5.
Long JH, Aziz TN, de los Reyes III FL, Ducoste JJ. Anaerobic co-digestion of fat, oil, and grease (FOG): a review of gas production and process limitations. Process Saf Environ Protect 2012;90(3):231-45.
 
6.
Luostarinen S, Luste S, Sillanpaa M. Increased biogas production at wastewater treatment plants through co-digestion of sewage sludge with grease trap sludge from a meat processing plant. Bioresour Technol 2009;100: 79-85.
 
7.
Davidsson A, Lövstedt C, la Cour Jansen J, Gruvberger C, Aspegren H. Codigestion of grease trap sludge and sewage sludge. Waste Manage 28(6), 2008; 986-92.
 
8.
Parawira, W., Enzyme research and applications in biotechnological intensification of biogas production. Crit. Rev. Biotechnol. 32, 2012;172-186.
 
9.
Yang, Q. et al., Enhanced efficiency of biological excess sludge hydrolysis under anaerobic digestion by additional enzymes. Bioresour. Technol. 101, 2010; 2924-2930.
 
10.
Li, X.S., Ma, H.Z., Wang, Q.H., Matsumoto, S., Maeda, T., Ogawa, H.I., Isolation, identification of sludge-lysing strain and its utilization in thermophilic aerobic digestion for waste activated sludge. Bioresour. Technol. 100, 2009; 2475-2481.
 
11.
Tang, Y., Yang, Y.L., Li, X.M., Yang, Q., Wang, D.B., Zeng, G.M., The isolation, identification of sludge-lysing thermophilic bacteria and its utilization in solubilization for excess sludge. Environ. Technol. 33, 2015; 961-966.
 
12.
Parmar, N., Singh, A., Ward, O.P., Enzyme treatment to reduce solids and improve settling of sewage sludge. J. Ind. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 26, 2001; 383-386.
 
13.
Valladao ABG, Sartore PE, Freire DMG, Cammarota MC. Evaluation of different pre-hydrolysis times and enzyme pool concentrations on the biodegradability of poultry slaughterhouse wastewater with a high fat content. Water Sci Technol 2009;60(1):243-9.
 
14.
Rosa DR, Duarte ICS, Saavedra NK, Varesche MB, Zaiat M, Cammarota MC, et al. Performance and molecular evaluation of an anaerobic system with suspended biomass for treating wastewater with high fat content after enzymatic hydrolysis. Bioresour Technol 2009;100(24):6170-6.
 
15.
Mobarak-Qamsari E, Kasra-Kermanshahi R, Nosrati M, Amani T. Enzymatic prehydrolysis of high fat content dairy wastewater as a pretreatment for anaerobic digestion. Int J Environ Res 2012;6(2):475-80.
 
16.
la Cour Jansen, J., Davidsson, A., Dey, E.S., Norrlow, O., Enzyme assisted sludge minimization. Chemical Water and Wastewater Treatment VIII, Gothenburg Symposium, Orlando, FL, United States, 2004; 345-353.
 
17.
Lagerkvist, A., Chen, H., Control of two step anaerobic degradation of municipal solid waste (MSW) by enzyme addition. Water Sci. Technol. 27 (2), 1993; 47-56.
 
18.
Wawrzynczyk, J., Dey, E.S., Norrlo¨w, O., Jansen, J.l.C., Alternative method for sludge reduction using commercial enzymes. In: Eigth CIWEM/Aqua Enviro European Biosolids and Organic Residuals Conference, Wakefield, West Yorkshire, UK, 2003; 1-5.
 
19.
Wawrzynczyk J., Recktenwald M., Norrlo O., Dey E.S., The function of cation-binding agents in the enzymatic treatment of municipal sludge, Watrer Research 42 (2008) 1555 - 1562.
 
20.
www.bioarcus.pl, 20.01.2013.
 
21.
Ronja B., Enzymatic treatment of wastewater sludge in presence of a cation binding agent-improved solubilisation and increased methane production. Linkopings University, Sweden, 2008; 49-50.
 
22.
Ahuja S.K., Ferreira G.M., Moreira A.R., Utilization of enzymes for environmental applications. Crit. Rev. Biotechnol. 24 (2-3), 2004; 125-154.
 
eISSN:2450-8594
ISSN:2080-5187
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top