ORIGINAL ARTICLE
In-field Verification of the Applicability of MEMS-IMU Accelerometers for Monitoring of Mining-induced Seismic Activity
 
More details
Hide details
1
Rock engineering department, KGHM CUPRUM sp. z o.o. Research and Development Centre., Poland
 
2
Chair of Mining Engineering and Mineral Economics, MONTANUNIVERSITÄT LEOBEN, Austria
 
3
Geosciences Barcelona, CSIC, Spain
 
 
Submission date: 2024-10-21
 
 
Final revision date: 2024-11-23
 
 
Acceptance date: 2024-12-02
 
 
Online publication date: 2024-12-08
 
 
Publication date: 2024-12-08
 
 
Corresponding author
Krzysztof Fuławka   

Rock engineering department, KGHM CUPRUM sp. z o.o. Research and Development Centre., Poland
 
 
Civil and Environmental Engineering Reports 2024;34(4):563-581
 
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
Measurements of seismic activity induced by mining operations are a basic tool for assessing the level of dynamic load associated with the occurrence of tremors. Knowledge of the location of the source of vibrations and the nature of seismicity is the basis for the safe planning of operations and design of both underground and surface infrastructure. The key parameter influencing the quality and reliability of seismic measurements is the coverage density of the analysed area with measurement stations. Unfortunately, the cost of seismic networks using standard devices is so high that in most cases the density of the network is much lower than needed for a good resolution and low event detection threshold. A certain breakthrough in this area may be the introduction of cost-effective measuring devices based on MEMS technology. This study compares the seismic data collected with the use of MEMS-IMU accelerometers with standard accelerometers for field seismic monitoring. The basis for the comparison was the analysis of data recorded by both devices located on the same site for two months. The comparison was carried out in terms of the characteristics of seismic waveforms, their amplitude distribution, frequency characteristics and effective duration of vibrations. Based on the results of the analysis, it was shown that MEMS-IMU accelerometers can be successfully used to monitor seismicity induced by mining activities in the near wave field.
REFERENCES (19)
1.
Cieślik, J, Burtan, Z, Chlebowski, D and Zorychta, A 2017. Geomechanical analysis of location and conditions for mining-induced tremors in LGOM copper mines. Journal of Sustainable Mining, 16(3), 94–103. doi: 10.1016/j.jsm.2017.10.002.
 
2.
Fuławka, K, Pytel, W and Pałac-Walko, B 2020. Near-Field Measurement of Six Degrees of Freedom Mining-Induced Tremors in Lower Silesian Copper Basin. Sensors, 20(23), 6801. doi: 10.3390/s20236801.
 
3.
Das, J, Balasubramaniam, V, Goverdhan, K and Ganapathy, G 2016. Overview of seismic monitoring and assessment of seismic hazard based on a decade of seismic events. Proceedings of the conference on Recent Advances in Rock Engineering (RARE 2016), Atlantis Press, November 2016. https://doi.org/10.2991/rare-1....
 
4.
Pytel, W, Fuławka, K, Pałac-Walko, B, Mertuszka, P, Kisiel, J, Jalas, P and Shekov, V 2020. Universal approach for risk identification and evaluation in underground facilities. Mining Scince, 27, 165–181. doi: 10.37190/msc202712.
 
5.
Li, H, Cao, A, Gong, S, Wang, C and Zhang, R 2022. Evolution characteristics of seismic detection probability in underground mines and its application for assessing seismic risks—a case study. Sensors, 22(10), 3682. https://doi.org/10.3390/s22103....
 
6.
Mendecki, AJ (Ed.). 1996. Seismic Monitoring in Mines. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands. doi: 10.1007/978-94-009-1539-8.
 
7.
Riemer, K, and Durrheim, R 2012. Mining seismicity in the witwatersrand basin: monitoring, mechanisms and mitigation strategies in perspective. Journal of Rock Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, 4(3), 228-249. https://doi.org/10.3724/sp.j.1....
 
8.
Trojanowski, J, Plesiewicz, B and Wiszniowski, J 2015. Seismic Monitoring of Poland–Description and Results of Temporary Seismic Project with Mobile Seismic Network. Acta Geophysica, 63(1), 17–44. doi: 10.2478/s11600-014-0255-0.
 
9.
Fuławka, K, Mertuszka, P, Szumny, M, Stolecki, L, and Szczerbiński, K 2022. Application of MEMS-Based Accelerometers for Near-Field Monitoring of Blasting-Induced Seismicity. Minerals, 12(5), 533. doi: 10.3390/min12050533.
 
10.
Esposito, M, Marzorati, S, Belli, A, Ladina, C, Palma, L, Calamita, C and Pierleoni, P 2024. Low-cost MEMS accelerometers for earthquake early warning systems: A dataset collected during seismic events in central Italy. Data in Brief, 53, 110174. doi: 10.1016/j.dib.2024.110174.
 
11.
Li, Z 2021. Recent advances in earthquake monitoring I: Ongoing revolution of seismic instrumentation. Earthquake Science, 34(2), 177–188. doi: 10.29382/eqs-2021-0011.
 
12.
Li Z. 2021. Recent advances in earthquake monitoring II: Emergence of next-generation intelligent systems. Earthquake Science, 34(6): 531–540,. DOI: 10.29382/eqs-2021-0054.
 
13.
KGHM Polska Miedź S.A. website: www.kghm.com, accessed on 9/2024.
 
14.
EPOS TCS AH, website: https://episodesplatform.eu, accessed on 9/2024.
 
15.
Milczarek, W, Kopeć, A, Głąbicki, D and Bugajska, N 2021, Induced Seismic Events—Distribution of Ground Surface Displacements Based on InSAR Methods and Mogi and Yang Models. Remote Sens. 13, 1451. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs1308....
 
16.
McNamara, DE, Hutt, CR, Gee, LS, Benz, HM and Buland, RP 2009. A Method to Establish Seismic Noise Baselines for Automated Station Assessment. Seismological Research Letters, 80(4), 628–637. doi: 10.1785/gssrl.80.4.628.
 
17.
Jana, N, Singh, C, Biswas, R, Grewal, N and Singh, A 2017. Seismic noise analysis of broadband stations in the Eastern Ghat Mobile Belt of India using power spectral density. Geomatics, Natural Hazards and Risk, 8(2), 1622–1630. doi: 10.1080/19475705.2017.1365777.
 
18.
Akima, H 1970. A new method of interpolation and smooth curve fitting based on local procedures. Journal of the ACM. 17 589–602. Archived (PDF) from the original on 2020-12-18. Retrieved 2020-12-18.
 
19.
Hinkle DE, Wiersma W and Jurs SG. Applied Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences. 5th ed. Boston: Houghton Mifflin; 2003.
 
eISSN:2450-8594
ISSN:2080-5187
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top