The purification of microplastic samples is a crucial step in environmental research, aiming to remove contaminants and ensure accurate analysis. This study explores various methods for purifying microplastics, focusing on the removal of organic contaminants, specifically fulvic acids. Comparative analysis using microscopic imaging techniques was conducted to evaluate the effectiveness of these methods. The results highlight the complexities involved in microplastic purification and the challenges associated with different approaches. While some methods showed promising outcomes, such as the sonification method, it was also observed that they could potentially alter the microplastic structure. Additionally, the limitations and potential interferences of other purification methods, such as Fenton's solution, were identified. This study underscores the importance of selecting purification methods that minimize negative impacts on microplastics and ensure reliable analysis. Further research is needed to optimize purification techniques and fully understand their effects on microplastic integrity. This research contributes to the broader goal of developing robust methodologies for microplastic analysis in environmental studies.
REFERENCES(18)
1.
Hidalgo-Ruz, V 2012. Microplastics in the marine environment: a review of the methods used for identification and quantification. Environ Sci Technol. 6: 3060–3075.
Löder, MGJ and Gerdts, G 2015. Methodology used for the detection and identification of microplastics-a critical appraisal. Springer International Publishing, 201–227.
Zhao, S 2017. An approach for extraction, characterization and quantitation of microplastic in natural marine snow using Raman microscopy. Anal. Methods. 9: 1470–1478.
Schrank, I, Möller, JN, Imhof, HK, Hauenstein, O, Zielke, F and Agarwal, S 2022. Microplastic sample purification methods – Assessing detrimental effects of purification procedures on specific plastic types. Sci Total Environ.833: 154824.
Scott, DE and Martin, JP 1990. Synthesis and degradation of natural and synthetic humic material in soil. W: Maccarthy P, Clapp CE, Malcolm RL, Bloom PR ed. Humic Substances in Soil and Crop Sciences: Selected Readings. Madison, WI: SSSA, Inc. 37–58.
Masura, J, Baker, J, Foster, G and Arthur, C 2015. Laboratory Methods for the Analysis of Microplastics in the Marine Environment: Recommendations for quantifying synthetic particles in waters and sediments.
Hidalgo-Ruz, V, Gutow, L, Thompson, RC and Thiel, M. 2012. Microplastics in the marine environment: a review of the methods used for identification and quantification. Environ Sci Technol. 46: 3060–3075.
Xu X-R, Li X-Y, Li X-Z and Li, H-B 2009. Degradation of melatonin by UV, UV/H2O2, Fe2+/H2O2 and UV/Fe2+/H2O2 processes. Sep Purif Technol. 68: 261–266.
Długosz, J 2014. Fenton method and its modifications in the treatment leachate - for review. Archives of Waste Managment and Environmental Protection. 16: 33–42.
We process personal data collected when visiting the website. The function of obtaining information about users and their behavior is carried out by voluntarily entered information in forms and saving cookies in end devices. Data, including cookies, are used to provide services, improve the user experience and to analyze the traffic in accordance with the Privacy policy. Data are also collected and processed by Google Analytics tool (more).
You can change cookies settings in your browser. Restricted use of cookies in the browser configuration may affect some functionalities of the website.