ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Numerical Simulation of Unconfined Compression Tests of Sandstone Using the Discrete Element Method in LS-DYNA
 
More details
Hide details
1
Department of Geotechnics and Transportation Engineering, Faculty of Civil Engineering, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, Johor Bahru, Malaysia
 
 
Submission date: 2024-12-24
 
 
Final revision date: 2025-02-09
 
 
Acceptance date: 2025-02-18
 
 
Online publication date: 2025-04-18
 
 
Publication date: 2025-04-18
 
 
Corresponding author
Muhammad Irfan Bin Shahrin   

Department of Geotechnics and Transportation Engineering, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, Malaysia
 
 
Civil and Environmental Engineering Reports 2025;35(2):222-233
 
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
This study presents a numerical simulation of unconfined compression tests (UCTs) on sandstone, utilizing the Discrete Element Method (DEM) in LS-DYNA. The primary objective of this research was to find an optimal mesh configuration to imitate the laboratory testing process by numerical modeling to enhance the reliability of data and reduce the time and cost required for complex experiments. Laboratory-derived rock properties were integrated into the DEM simulation as input parameters. Five numerical models were simulated with varying mesh densities to optimize mesh size. The results were validated by comparing failure mode, stress-strain curves, and uniaxial compressive strength (UCS) with experimental data. A model with a mesh size of 40/30 elements illustrated the closest correlation to the laboratory test, exhibiting a similar stress-strain curve pattern and a minimal UCS difference of 2.62%. Additionally, the failure modes observed in both simulations aligned closely. This similarity between the results of the laboratory experiment and the numerical model proves the efficiency of the numerical model in simulated laboratory tests and offers an opportunity to calibrate the micro-parameters of other constitutive models which can save both the time and money required to determine complex parameters, especially avoiding the risk of critical laboratory experiments.
REFERENCES (29)
1.
Mahdi, DS and Alrazzaq, AAA 2023. Rock Mechanical Properties: A Review of Experimental Tests and Prediction Approaches. Iraqi Journal of Oil and Gas Research 3, 106-115.
 
2.
Cundall, PA and Strack, OD 1979. A discrete numerical model for granular assemblies. Geotechnique 29, 47-65.
 
3.
Shahrin, MI, Abdullah, RA, Alel, MNA, Saari, R, Ibrahim, NA, Yusof, NAM and Abd Rashid, MF 2021. Convergence Study for Rock Unconfined Compression Test Using Discrete Element Method. International Journal of Integrated Engineering 13, 119-124.
 
4.
Wu, Y, Hao, H, Gao, M, Gao, Z and Gao, Y 2023. A modified particle contact model for matching the ratios of uniaxial compressive to tensile strength of brittle rocks. Geomechanics and Geophysics for Geo-Energy and Geo-Resources 9, 126.
 
5.
Abhilasha, P and Antony Balan, T 2014. Numerical analysis of seepage in Embankment dams. IOSR Journal of Mechanical and Civil Engineering 4, 13-23.
 
6.
Wang, K-Y, Shallcross, DE, Hadjinicolaou, P and Giannakopoulos, C 2002. An efficient chemical systems modelling approach. Environmental Modelling & Software 17, 731-745.
 
7.
Biliński, T and Socha, T 2014. Numerical analysis of deflections of multi-layered beams. Civil and Environmental Engineering Reports 15, 33-42.
 
8.
Tahera, K, Earl, C and Claudia, E 2014. Integrating virtual and physical testing to accelerate the engineering product development process. International Journal of Information Technology and Management 13, 154-175.
 
9.
Zienkiewicz, OC and Cheung, Y 1968. The finite element method in structural and continuum mechanics.
 
10.
Potyondy, DO and Cundall, PA 2004. A bonded-particle model for rock. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences 41, 1329-1364.
 
11.
Mahabadi, O, Grasselli, G and Munjiza, A 2009. Numerical modelling of a Brazilian Disc test of layered rocks using the combined finite-discrete element method. RockEng09: 3rd Canada-US rock mechanics symposium.
 
12.
Zhang, P, Yin, Z-Y and Jin, Y-F 2021. State-of-the-art review of machine learning applications in constitutive modeling of soils. Archives of Computational Methods in Engineering 28, 3661-3686.
 
13.
Shen, J and Jimenez, R 2018. Predicting the shear strength parameters of sandstone using genetic programming. Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment 77, 1647-1662.
 
14.
Cao, W 2025. A comparative study of hybrid adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference systems to predict the unconfined compressive strength of rocks. Journal of Engineering and Applied Science 72, 3.
 
15.
Lawal, A, Adebayo, B, Afeni, T, Okewale, I, Ajaka, E, Amigun, J, Akinbinu, V and Apena, W 2024. Soft computing applications for optimum rock fragmentation: an advanced overview. Geotechnical and Geological Engineering 42, 859-880.
 
16.
Samui, P 2013. Multivariate adaptive regression spline (MARS) for prediction of elastic modulus of jointed rock mass. Geotechnical and Geological Engineering 31, 249-253.
 
17.
Armaghani, DJ, Amin, MFM, Yagiz, S, Faradonbeh, RS and Abdullah, RA 2016. Prediction of the uniaxial compressive strength of sandstone using various modeling techniques. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences 85, 174-186.
 
18.
Koken, E and Strzalkowski, P 2024. Development of Soft Computing-Based Predictive Tools for Estimating the Young Modulus of Weak Rocks. Civil and Environmental Engineering Reports 34, 182-193.
 
19.
Devi, S, Nagaraja, K, Thanuja, L, Reddy, M and Ramakrishna, S 2022. Finite element analysis over transmission region of coronavirus in CFD analysis for the respiratory cough droplets. Ain Shams Engineering Journal 13, 101766.
 
20.
Lin, S, Zhang, C, Zhou, H and Dai, F 2020. Numerical analyses of mesh size effects on core discing. Arabian Journal of Geosciences 13, 1-11.
 
21.
Antony, S, Olugbenga, A and Ozerkan, N 2018. Sensing, measuring and modelling the mechanical properties of sandstone. Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering 51, 451-464.
 
22.
Karajan, N, Han, Z, Ten, H and Wang, J 2013. Interaction possibilities of bonded and loose particles in LS-DYNA. Proceedings of the 9th European LS-DYNA Users' Conference, Manchester, UK.
 
23.
Mardalizad, A, Scazzosi, R, Manes, A and Giglio, M 2018. Testing and numerical simulation of a medium strength rock material under unconfined compression loading. Journal of Rock Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering 10, 197-211.
 
24.
Smolnik, G 2019. DEM (PFC3D) numerical simulation of the influence of grain orientation on the strength of the Kimachi sandstone. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science 261, 012047.
 
25.
Moneey, R, Rahim, I and Musta, B 2022. Some mechanical characterization of the Sandakan formation's sandstone, Sabah, Malaysia. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science 1103, 012025.
 
26.
Wong, T-f and Baud, P 2009. Grain crushing, pore collapse and strain localization in porous sandstone. Mechanics of Natural Solids, 239-254.
 
27.
Basu, A, Mishra, D and Roychowdhury, K 2013. Rock failure modes under uniaxial compression, Brazilian, and point load tests. Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment 72, 457-475.
 
28.
Noori, M, Khanlari, G, Sarfarazi, V, Rafiei, B, Nejati, HR and Schubert, W 2022. Experimental test and numerical simulation of the effect of brittleness on the microfracturing of sandstone. Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment 81, 309.
 
29.
Fischer-Cripps, AC 2007. Introduction to contact mechanics. Springer.
 
eISSN:2450-8594
ISSN:2080-5187
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top