ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Performance Evaluation of the Base Isolation Technique on the Blast Mitigation of Spatial Structures
1
Assistant Professor, SJB Institute of Technology, Bangalore, Karnataka, India
2
Assistant Professor, Faculty of Civil and Surveying Engineering, Graduate University of Advanced Technology, Kerman, Iran
Online publication date: 2020-11-09
Publication date: 2020-09-01
Civil and Environmental Engineering Reports 2020;30(3):134-160
KEYWORDS
ABSTRACT
Unpredictable threat and danger may occur in a structural system due to blast loading. Long-span spatial structures are very practical and common in airport terminals, exhibition centers, stadiums, and other public buildings. For high-rise and multi-story structures, horizontal pressure plays a major role in the level of damage to a structure, whereas long-span structures may be influenced by both horizontal and vertical pressure. In the current study, the applicability of lead rubber bearing (LRB) has been evaluated on a low-rise, long-span structure. The analysis is carried out by using the MATLAB Simulink platform. The simulation results indicate that the base isolation system which is usually adopted for seismic control of structures can adequately reduce the structural responses under blast loadings.
REFERENCES (45)
1.
Amini, MA and Poursha, M 2018. Adaptive force-base multimode pushover analysis for seismic evaluation of midrise buildings, Journal of Structural Engineering, 144, 1-12.
2.
ASCE 2010. Minimum design loads for buildings and other structures. Reston, USA: American Society of Civil Engineers.
3.
ASCE 2011. Blast protection of buildings. Reston USA: American Society of Civil Engineers.
4.
Bhasker, RP and Jangid RS 2001. Performance of sliding systems under near-fault motions. Nuclear Engineering and Design 203, 251-272.
5.
Buckle, IG and Mayes, R L 1990. Seismic isolation: history, application and performance-a world overview. Earthquake Spectra 6, 161-202.
6.
Chopra, AK and Goel, RK 2002. A modal pushover analysis procedure for estimating seismic demands for buildings. Earthquake Eng Struct Dyn 31, 561–82.
7.
Chopra, AK and Goel, RK 2003. A modal pushover analysis procedure to estimate seismic demands for unsymmetrical-plan buildings: theory and preliminary evaluation. Earthquake Engineering Research Center.
8.
Chopra, AK Goel, RK Chintanapakdee, C 2004. Evaluation of a modified MPA procedure assuming higher modes as elastic to estimate seismic demands. Earthquake Spectra 20, 757–778.
9.
CSA 2012. Design and assessment of buildings subjected to blast loads. Mississauga, Ontario: Canada.
10.
Davis, C Sammarco, E Williamson, E 2017. Bridge security design manual. Washington, DC, USA.
11.
Dusenberry, DO 2010. Handbook of Blast-Resistant Design of Buildings, John Wiley & Sons Inc.
13.
FEMA, 2003. Primer for design of commercial buildings to mitigate terrorist attacks. Washington, USA.
14.
FHWA, 2003. R ecommendations for bridge and tunnel security, blue ribbon panel report. Report No. FHWA-IF-03-036, Washington, DC, USA.
15.
Gelfandetal, B Voskoboinikov, I Khomik, S 2004. Recording the position of a blastwave front in air. Combust Explos Shock Waves 40, 734–6.
16.
Ghodke, S and Jangid, RS 2016. Equivalent linear elastic viscous model of shape memory alloy for isolated structure. Advances in Engineering Software, 99, 1-8.
17.
Goel, RK and Chopra, AK 2004. Evaluation of modal and FEMA pushover analyses: SAC buildings. Earthquake spectra 20, 225–54.
18.
Jalilkhani, M Ghasemi, SH Danesh, M 2020. A multi-mode adaptive pushover analysis procedure for estimating the seismic demands of RC moment- resisting frames. Engineering Structure, 213, 1-18.
19.
Jangid, RS 2000. Optimum frictional elements in sliding isolation systems. Computer and Structures, 76, 651-661.
20.
Jangid, RS and Datta, TK 1995. Seismic behaviour of base isolated buildings – a state of the art review. Journal of structures and Buildings, 110, 186-203.
22.
Kelly, JM and Konstantinidis, DA 2011. Mechanics Of Rubber Bearings For Seismic And Vibration Isolation.Wiley.
25.
Krauthammer, T Astarlioglu, S Blasko, J Soh, TB Ng, PH 2008. Pressure– impulse diagrams for the behaviour assessment of structural components. Int J Impact Eng, 35, 771–83.
27.
NCHRP 2005, Washington, DC, USA. Blast-resistant highway bridges: design and detailing guidelines. National Cooperative Highway Research Program.
28.
Nourzadeh, D Humar, J Braimah, A 2017. Comparison of response of building structures to blast loading and seismic excitations, Procedia Eng. 210, 320–325.
29.
Paret, TF Sasaki, KK Eilbeck, DH Freeman, SA 1996. Approximate inelastic procedures to identify failure mechanisms from higher mode effects. In Proceedings of the eleventh world conference on earthquake engineering, 2.
30.
Remennikov, AM 2002. Blast Resistant Consulting: A New Challenge for Structural Engineers. Australian Journal of Structural Engineering 4, 121-134.
31.
Shrimali, MK and Jangid, RS 2002. Non-linear seismic response of base-isolated liquid storage tanks to bi-directional excitation, Nuclear Engineering and Design 217, 1-21.
32.
Shrimali, MK and Jangid, RS 2002. Seismic response of liquid storage tanks isolated by sliding bearings. Nuclear Engineering and Design 24, 909-921.
33.
Shrimali, MK and Jangid, RS 2004. Seismic analysis of base-isolated liquid storage tanks. Nuclear Engineering and Design 275, 59-75.
34.
Smith, PJ 2013, New York, USA. Terrorism in Asia: a persistent challenge sustained by ideological, physical, and criminal enablers. In: Handbook of Asian criminology. Springer 147–64.
35.
TM-5-1300 1990, Washington DC, USA. Design of structures to resist the effects of accidental explosions, Technical Manual.
36.
TM-5-855-1 1986, USA. Fundamentals of protective design for conventional weapons. Technical Manual.
37.
US Department of Defense 2002, USA. Design and analysis of hardened structures to conventional weapons effects. UFC 3-340-01. Unified Facilities Criteria.
38.
US Department of Defense 2008. Structures to resist the effects of accidental explosions. Report no. UFC 3-340-02. United Facilities Criteria.
39.
US Department of Défense 2012, USA. DoD minimum antiterrorism standards for buildings. Report no. UFC 4-010-01.
40.
US General Services Administration (GSA) 2003. ISC security design criteria for new federal office buildings and major modernization projects.
41.
Williamson, EB et al. 2010. Blast-resistant highway bridges: design and detailing guidelines, USA National Cooperative Highway Research Program Rep. No. 645.
42.
Williamson, EB Winget, DG 2005. Risk management and design of critical bridges for terrorist attacks. J Bridge Eng, 10, 96–106.
43.
Xu, W Du, D Wang, S Liu, W Li, W 2019. Shaking table tests on the multidimensional seismic response of long span grid structure with base isolation. Engineering Structure 201, 1-16.
44.
Zhang, C Gholipour G Mousavi AA 2019. Blast loads induced responses of RC structural members: State-of-the-art review Composite 195, 1-24.
45.
Zhang, F Wu, C Zhao, X-L Heidarpour, A Li, Z 2016. Experimental and numerical study of blast resistance of square CFDST columns with steel-fibre reinforced concrete. Eng Struct 149, 50–63.
| eISSN: | 2450-8594 |
| ISSN: | 2080-5187 |
We process personal data collected when visiting the website. The function of obtaining information about users and their behavior is carried out by voluntarily entered information in forms and saving cookies in end devices. Data, including cookies, are used to provide services, improve the user experience and to analyze the traffic in accordance with the Privacy policy. Data are also collected and processed by Google Analytics tool (more).
You can change cookies settings in your browser. Restricted use of cookies in the browser configuration may affect some functionalities of the website.
You can change cookies settings in your browser. Restricted use of cookies in the browser configuration may affect some functionalities of the website.
