ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Prevention Through Design Approach For Geotechnical Design Hazard Risk Reduction
1
Civil Engineering Studies
College of Engineering, Universiti Teknologi MARA, Malaysia
2
Faculty of Civil Engineering, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, Malaysia
3
Faculty of Chemical and Energy Engineering, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, Malaysia
4
Faculty of Built Environment and Surveying, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, Malaysia
Submission date: 2025-01-07
Final revision date: 2025-03-05
Acceptance date: 2025-03-07
Online publication date: 2025-03-19
Publication date: 2025-03-19
Corresponding author
Civil and Environmental Engineering Reports 2025;35(2):114-131
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
Malaysian construction workers confront high accident rates and sustainability issues due to geotechnical risks. This study determines the significance of geotechnical hazards arising during conceptual design of construction projects and proposes Prevention through Design (PtD) strategies to mitigate the hazards. The mixed-method research uses a questionnaire survey for geotechnical hazards and Focus Group Discussions (FGD) for PtD solutions. The hazards are categorized into seven design aspects namely G1(Soil or ground Instability), G2(Presence of water table/ ground water level), G3(Sloppy area), G4(Soil classification), G5(Flood-prone area and proximity of area to water bodies), G6(Landfill Area) and G7(Area prone to earthquake). Ultimately, adopting PtD can significantly reduce geotechnical hazards, improve safety, and enhance project performance, fostering a safer and more resilient construction industry in Malaysia. The research findings aim to assist Malaysia's Department of Occupational Safety and Health (DOSH) in advancing the integration of PtD principles, as emphasized in the OSHCI(M) Guideline.
REFERENCES (47)
1.
Euripides, RA 2008. Troubled Projects in Constructions Due to Inadequate Risk Management. In School of Management of City University of Seattle (Issue June). City University of Seattle.
2.
Calik, I, Gurgun, AP, and Ozcoban, MS 2023. Methods and Tools Used for Management of Geotechnical Risks in Construction Projects. Proceedings of International Structural Engineering and Construction 10(1), 71–76.
3.
Joel, OT and Oguanobi, VU 2024. Geotechnical assessments for renewable energy infrastructure: Ensuring stability in wind and solar projects. Engineering Science & Technology Journal 5(5), 1588–1605.
4.
Elkaseh, AAA, Zakaria, R, Vighio, AA, Pawlowicz, JA, Munikanan, V, Khan, JS, Sahamir, SR and Shakri, MRA 2024. Unveiling Safety Practices and Safety Performance Measurement in Construction: A Bibliometric Analysis. Civil And Environmental Engineering Reports 34(4), 483–502.
5.
Wichtmann, T, Tafili, M, Staubach, P, Macha, J, Schmüdderich, C and Lieske, W 2023. Perspectives, demands and challenges of future research in Soil Mechanics and Soil Dynamics.
6.
Kalatehjari, R 2023. Special Issue on Geotechnical Engineering Hazards. Applied Sciences (Switzerland), 13(8), 14–16.
7.
Polyankin, AG, Potokina, A and Kulikova, EY 2020. Geotechnical risk assessment during the construction of international crossing under the runways of Sheremetyevo airport. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering.
8.
Koc, K, Gurgun, AP and Ozbek, ME 2020. Effects of geotechnical risks on cost and schedule in infrastructure projects. Proceedings of International Structural Engineering and Construction 7(2).
9.
Alhammadi, SA, Tayeh, BA, Alaloul, WS and Jouda, AF 2022. Occupational health and safety practice in infrastructure projects. International Journal of Occupational Safety and Ergonomics 28(4), 2631–2644.
10.
Alsardi, A and Yerro, A 2023. Journal of Rock Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering Coseismic site response and slope instability using periodic boundary conditions in the material point method. Journal of Rock Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering 15(3), 641–658.
11.
Joshi, MG, Jayeshkumar, D and Pitroda, R 2019. Safety Management in Infrastructure Project: A Review. Journal of Emerging Technologies and Innovative Research 6, 2–10.
12.
Baghdadi, A 2024. Navigating occupational safety and health challenges in sustainable infrastructure projects: a comprehensive review. Frontiers in Built Environment 10, 1–12.
13.
Sidani, A, Poças Martins, J and Soeiro, A 2023. Catalysing Construction Safety: A Comparative Analysis of Technological Advancements across High-Risk Industries. Buildings 13(11), 1–19.
14.
El-maissi, AM, Argyroudis, SA and Nazri, FM 2021. Seismic vulnerability assessment methodologies for roadway assets and networks: A state-of-the-art review. Sustainability (Switzerland) 13(1), 1–32.
15.
Al-Hadithe, A K A and Bingöl, Öğr ÜBV 2022. Managing Geotechnıcal Rısks of Infrastructure Projects in Iraq. International Journal of Engineering Research and General Science Volume 10(4), 16–22.
16.
Lunev, A A and Sirotyuk, VV 2019. Magazine of Civil Engineering. Magazine of Civil Engineering 86(2), 72–82.
17.
Das, S, Rastogi, A and Kumar, K 2021. Applicability of Risk Assessment Tools and Techniques for a Construction Project. Journal of Research in Infrastructure Designing 4(3), 1–18.
18.
Smolarz, A 2019. Analysis of Accidents in Construction in 2015-2017. Civil and Environmental Engineering Reports 29(4), 149–156.
19.
Ajith, S, Arumugaprabu, V, Ajith, V, Naresh, K, and Sreekanth, PSR 2022. Hazard identification and risk assessment in firework industry. Materials Today: Proceedings 56(10), 1083–1085.
20.
Ajslev, JZN, Møller, JL, Andersen, MF, Pirzadeh, P and Lingard, H 2022. The Hierarchy of Controls as an Approach to Visualize the Impact of Occupational Safety and Health Coordination. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 19(5).
21.
Hardison, D and Hallowell, M 2018. Identifying safety hazards in design: Evaluating the difference between BIM and 2D CAD drawings. Safety and Disaster Management - Selected Papers from the Construction Research Congress 2018, 154–163.
22.
Moustafa, SSR, Mohamed, A, El, HEAK and Ali, FS 2023. A fusion approach for evaluating ground conditions for seismic microzoning at the Egyptian Solar Park in Benban, Aswan. Environmental Earth Sciences 82(12), 1–21.
23.
Eze, KN, Anosike, CU, Eze, FN, Enabulele, EC and Benson, K P 2024. Climate Resilient and Sustainable Infrastructures: Geotechnical Challenges of Problematic Soils In Nigeria. Civil And Environmental Engineering Reports 34(4), 521–538.
24.
Castro-Nova, I, Gad, GM, Touran, A, Cetin, B, and Gransberg, DD 2018. Evaluating the Influence of Differing Geotechnical Risk Perceptions on Design-Build Highway Projects. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems, Part A: Civil Engineering 4(4).
25.
Aghimien, D 2025. Proactive prevention: embedding safety into South African construction design. Frontiers in Engineering and Built Environment 5(1), 68–85.
26.
Samsudin, NS, Mohammad, MZ, Khalil, N, Nadzri, ND and Izam Che Ibrahim, CK 2022. A thematic review on Prevention through design (PtD) concept application in the construction industry of developing countries. Safety Science 148(January), 105640.
27.
Abas, NH, Abd Rahman, R, Mohammad, H and Rahmat, MH 2020. Designer’s Confidence and Attitude towards Designing-for-Construction-Safety (DfCS) Implementation. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering 713(1).
28.
Edmondson, DR 2005. Likert scales: A history. Proceedings of the Conference on Historical Analysis and Research in Marketing (CHARM), 127–133.
29.
Krosnick, JA 2018. Question and Questionnaire Design. In D. L. Vannette and J. A. Krosnick (Eds.), The Palgrave Handbook of Survey Research (pp. 439–455). Palgrave Macmillan, Cham.
30.
Asmone, AS, Goh, YM and Lim, MSH 2022. Prioritization of industry level interventions to improve implementation of design for safety regulations. Journal of Safety Research 82, 352–366.
31.
Gambatese, JA, Gibb, A, Bust, P and Behm, M 2017. Expanding Prevention through Design (PtD) In Practice: Innovation, Change, and A Path Forward. Journal of Construction Project Management and Innovation 7(2), 1995–2006.
32.
Goh, YM and Chua, S 2016. Knowledge, Attitude and Practices for Design for Safety: A Study on Civil & Structural Engineers. Accident Analysis and Prevention 93, 260–266.
33.
Manu, P, Poghosyan, A, Mahamadu, AM, Mahdjoubi, L, Gibb, A, Behm, M and Akinade, OO 2019. Design for occupational safety and health: key attributes for organisational capability. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management 26(11), 2614–2636.
34.
Morgan, DL 1996. Focus Groups as Qualitative Research (Second Edi). SAGE Publications Ltd.
35.
Coskun, S, Washington, C and Erdogmus, E 2024. A Study on Causes of Gender Gap in Construction Management: High School Students’ Knowledge and Perceptions across Genders. Buildings 14(7).
36.
Rockström, J, Gupta, J, Qin, D, Lade, S J, Abrams, JF, Andersen, LS, Mckay, DIA, Bai, X, Bala, G, Bunn, SE, Ciobanu, D, Declerck, F, Ebi, K, Gifford, L, Gordon, C, Hasan, S, Kanie, N, Lenton, T M, Loriani, S, Zhang, X 2023. Safe and just Earth system boundaries. Nature 619(2023), 102–111.
37.
Dalapati, GK, Ghosh, S, A, TSP, Ramasubramanian, B, Samanta, A, Rathour, A, Wong, TKS, Chakrabortty, S, Ramakrishna, S and Kumar, A 2023. Maximizing solar energy production in ASEAN region: Opportunity and challenges. Results in Engineering 20(June), 101525.
38.
Ahmed, S, Umair, A, Rahim, M, Yunas, M, Waheed, A, Mumtaz, A and Farooqi, H 2022. Slope Steepness and Crop Vegetative Cover Impact on Soil and Water Losses Under High Rainfall Zone of Pothowar. Natural Volatiles & EssentialOils 9(2), 871–878.
39.
Mendyk, Ł, Hulisz, P, Świtoniak, M, Kalisz, B and Spychalski, W 2020. Human activity in the surroundings of a former mill pond (Turznice , N Poland ): Implications for soil classification and environmental hazard assessment Human activity in the surroundings of a former mill pond ( Turznice , N Poland ): implications for s. Soil Science Annual 71(4), 371–381.
40.
Osei, BK, Ahenkorah, I, Ewusi, A and Fiadonu, EB 2021. Assessment of flood prone zones in the Tarkwa mining area of Ghana using a GIS-based approach. Environmental Challenges 3(January), 100028.
41.
Yadav, H, Kumar, P and Singh, VP 2019. Hazards from the Municipal Solid Waste Dumpsites: A Review. Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Sustainable Waste Management through Design 336–342.
42.
Alao, JO 2023. Impacts of open dumpsite leachates on soil and groundwater quality. Groundwater for Sustainable Development, 20(2023), 100877.
43.
Katsanos, EI, Sextos, AG and Manolis, G D 2010. Selection of earthquake ground motion records: A state-of-the-art review from a structural engineering perspective. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering 30, 157–169.
45.
Nyumba, TO, Wilson, K, Christina, JD and Mukherjee, N 2018. The Use of Focus Group Discussion Methodology: Insights from Two Decades of Application in Conservation. Methods in Ecology and Evolution 9(1), 20–32.
46.
Schreier, M 2012. Qualitative Content Analysis in Practice. SAGE Publications Ltd.
47.
Siraj, NB and Fayek, AR 2019. Risk Identification and Common Risks in Construction: Literature Review and Content Analysis. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management 145(9), 03119004.
Share
RELATED ARTICLE
| eISSN: | 2450-8594 |
| ISSN: | 2080-5187 |
We process personal data collected when visiting the website. The function of obtaining information about users and their behavior is carried out by voluntarily entered information in forms and saving cookies in end devices. Data, including cookies, are used to provide services, improve the user experience and to analyze the traffic in accordance with the Privacy policy. Data are also collected and processed by Google Analytics tool (more).
You can change cookies settings in your browser. Restricted use of cookies in the browser configuration may affect some functionalities of the website.
You can change cookies settings in your browser. Restricted use of cookies in the browser configuration may affect some functionalities of the website.
