ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Proposal of an Encapsulation-led Disposal Method for Tannery Sludge – A Circularity Approach
 
More details
Hide details
1
Civil Engineering, National Institute of Technology Warangal, India
 
2
Civil Engineering, Vel Tech Rangarajan Dr Sagunthala R&D Institute of Science and Technology, India
 
 
Submission date: 2024-01-06
 
 
Final revision date: 2024-02-02
 
 
Acceptance date: 2024-02-04
 
 
Online publication date: 2024-03-08
 
 
Publication date: 2024-03-08
 
 
Corresponding author
Saravanan J   

Civil Engineering, National Institute of Technology Warangal, Warangal, India
 
 
Civil and Environmental Engineering Reports 2024;34(1):47-75
 
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
In the context of achieving sustainable development goals, continuously pushing possible extended research and attempting to implement the respective outcomes in expanding a circular economy for a broad range of products are high priorities. In this paper, we considered disposable tannery sludge as a matter of concern and proposed an innovative framework for placing tannery sludge in the economic value chain via an encapsulation technique-based construction product development. We used polypropylene plastic and a cement-water matrix as encapsulation materials, and the encapsulated tannery sludge bodies were tested for their drop strength, water absorbing behaviour, ability to leach chromium and tendency to lose weight upon ignition. Value of water absorption for the prepared double layered encapsulated tannery sludge bodies was 1.332%, the drop strength performance index arrived was 90% and 0.0001 µg/g of Chromium leaching was found in Toxicity Characteristic Leaching Procedure (TCLP) and shown 67% weight loss in thermogravimetric (TGA) analysis. The results confirmed the possibility of ecocompatible disposal and recirculation of tannery sludge for the sustainable production of building blocks in the form of encapsulated bodies. The outcomes of our work add upon a new perspective to the existing literature regarding the environmentally positive utilization of tannery sludge in the production of building blocks.
 
REFERENCES (48)
1.
Rocchi, L et al. 2021. Measuring circularity: an application of modified Material Circularity Indicator to agricultural systems. Agriculture Food and Economics 9, 1-13.
 
2.
Figge F et al. 2023. Definitions of the circular economy: Circularity matters. Ecological Economics 208, 107823.
 
3.
Li, L and Xu, G 2022. Circular economy towards zero waste and decarbonization. Circular Economy 1, 100002.
 
4.
Naqvi, SR et al. 2022. Circular Economy Approach to Address the Industrial Solid Waste Management. In: Baskar, C (ed) Handbook of Solid Waste Management. Springer Nature Singapore, 421–440.
 
5.
Gronlund, SE 2019. Indicators and methods to assess sustainability of wastewater sludge management in the perspective of two systems ecology models. Ecological Indicators 100, 45–54.
 
6.
Norouzi, M et al. 2021. Circular economy in the building and construction sector: A scientific evolution analysis. Journal of Building Engineering, 44, 1-18.
 
7.
Pallavaram Tanners CETP process flow diagram. Retrieved from: http://www.ptietc.org/project_.... (Accessed on 21 September 2023).
 
8.
Alibardi, L and Cossu, R 2016. Pre-treatment of tannery sludge for sustainable landfilling. Waste Management 52, 202–211.
 
9.
Celary, P and Sobik-Szoltysek, J 2014. Vitrification as an alternative to landfilling of tannery sewage sludge. Waste Management 34, 2520–2527.
 
10.
Vig, A.P et al. 2011. Vermicomposting of tannery sludge mixed with cattle dung into valuable manure using earthworm Eisenia fetida (Savigny). Bioresource Technology 102, 7941–7945.
 
11.
Malafaia, G et al. 2015. Vermicomposting of different types of tanning sludge (liming and primary) mixed with cattle dung. Ecological Engineering 85, 301–306.
 
12.
Wang, YS et al. 2007. Bioleaching of chromium from tannery sludge by indigenous Acidithiobacillus thiooxidans. Journal of Hazardous Materials 147, 319–324.
 
13.
Kavouras, P et al. 2015. Incineration of tannery sludge under oxic and anoxic conditions: Study of chromium speciation. Journal of Hazardous Materials 283, 672–679.
 
14.
Montanes, MT et al. 2014. The effectiveness of the stabilization/solidification process on the leachability and toxicity of the tannery sludge chromium. Journal of Environmental Management 143, 71–79.
 
15.
Varitis, S et al. 2017. Vitrification of incinerated tannery sludge in silicate matrices for chromium stabilization. Waste Management 59, 237–246.
 
16.
Jiang, XG et al. 2010. Combustion characteristics of tannery sludge and volatilization of heavy metals in combustion. Journal of Zhejiang University Science-A 11, 530–537.
 
17.
Swarnalatha, S et al. 2006. Starved air combustion-solidification/stabilization of primary chemical sludge from a tannery. Journal of Hazardous Materials 137, 304–313.
 
18.
Liang, WS and Lee, JF 2005. Molecular study of thermal immobilization of chromium (VI) with Clay. Journal of Air & Waste Management Association 55, 411–414.
 
19.
Contreras-Ramos, SM et al. 2004. Composting of tannery effluent with cow manure and wheat straw. Bioresource Technology 94, 223–228.
 
20.
Hashem, MA et al. 2021. Tannery liming sludge in compost production: sustainable waste management. Biomass Conversion and Biorefinery 23, 1-10.
 
21.
Mpofu, AB et al. 2019. Co-digestion of tannery waste activated sludge with slaughterhouse sludge to improve organic biodegradability and biomethane generation. Process Safety and Environmental Protection 131, 235–245.
 
22.
Della Zassa, M et al. Improved compaction of dried tannery wastewater sludge. Waste Management 46, 472–479.
 
23.
Nosek, R et al. 2017. Analysis of paper sludge pellets for energy Utilization. Bio resources 12, 7032–7040.
 
24.
Nosek, R et al. 2020. Investigation of pellet properties produced from a mix of straw and paper sludge, Applied Sciences 10, 1-9.
 
25.
Yilmaz, E et al. 2018. Co-pelletization of sewage sludge and agricultural wastes. Journal of Environmental Management 216, 169–175.
 
26.
Nikiema, J et al. 2013. Processing of Fecal Sludge to Fertilizer Pellets Using a Low-Cost Technology in Ghana. Environmental Pollution 2, 70–87.
 
27.
Juel, MAI et al. 2017. Sustainable use of tannery sludge in brick manufacturing in Bangladesh. Waste Management 60, 259–269.
 
28.
Abreu, MA and Toffoli, SM 2009. Characterization of a chromium-rich tannery waste and its potential use in ceramics. Ceramics International 35, 2225–2234.
 
29.
Basegio, T et al. 2002. Environmental and technical aspects of the utilisation of tannery sludge as a raw material for clay products. Journal of the European Ceramic Society 22, 2251–2259.
 
30.
Giugliano, M and Paggi, A 1985. Use of tannery sludge in brick production. Waste Management Research 3, 361–368.
 
31.
Ukwatta, A et al. 2015. Variation in physical and mechanical properties of fired-clay bricks incorporating ETP biosolids. Journal of Cleaner Production 119, 76–85.
 
32.
Amsayazhi, P and Saravana Raja Mohan, K 2018. Use of Sludge Waste as Ingredient in Making of Brick. International Journal of Engineering and Technology 7, 419-425.
 
33.
Rose, ETA et al. 2021. Eco Bricks from Industrial Wastes such as Tannery Sludge and Sugarcane Bagasse Ash. IOP Conference Series: Material Science and Engineering 1126, 012076.
 
34.
Weng, C.H et al. 2003. Utilization of sludge as brick materials. Advances in Environmental Research 7, 679–685.
 
35.
Anik Hasan, M et al. 2022. Stabilization of liming sludge in brick production: A way to reduce pollution in tannery. Construction and Building Materials 314, 125702.
 
36.
Milu, MS et al. 2022. Leather buffing dust in brick production: Solid waste management in tanneries. Case Studies in Construction Materials 17, e01625.
 
37.
Howells, J. 2024. Innovation intermediaries in a digital paradigm: A theoretical perspective. Technovation 129, 102889.
 
38.
Watanabe, Y and Tanaka, K 1999. Innovative sludge handling through pelletization/thickening. Water Research 33, 3245–3252.
 
39.
Zhang, S et al. 2020. Effect of Sludge Pellets Addition on Combustion Characteristics and Ash Behaviour of Municipal Solid Waste. Waste and Biomass Valorization 11, 5351–5361.
 
40.
Kong, D et al. 2010. Effect and mechanism of surface-coating pozzalanics materials around aggregate on properties and ITZ microstructure of recycled aggregate concrete. Construction and Building Materials 24, 701–708.
 
41.
Wong, KM, Lim, N, Lee, S, Seah, C, Hoe, J and Wang 2002. Drop impact test - Mechanics & physics of failure. Proceedings of 4th Electronics Packaging Technology Conference, Singapore, January 15-17, 327–333.
 
42.
BUREAU OF INDIAN STANDARDS, 1992. IS 3495 Parts 1-4: Methods of Tests of Burnt Clay building brick. 1-7.
 
43.
U.S. EPA Standard Testing Methods - Method 1311 Toxicity Characteristics Leaching Procedure Test. Retrieved from https://www.epa.gov/sites/defa.... (Accessed on 26 September 2023).
 
44.
Saravanan, J and Rao, PV 2023. Sustainable Chemistry for the Environment Past investigations on development of sustainable bricks – A comprehensive review. Sustainable Chemistry for the Environment 3, 100030.
 
45.
Telliard, WA 1988. Sampling procedures and protocols for the national sewage sludge survey, US Environment Protection Agency.
 
46.
Wang, J et al. 2020. Comparison of recycled aggregate treatment methods on the performance for recycled concrete. Construction and Building Materials 234, 117366.
 
47.
Song, P et al. 2018. Research and Application of Autodesk Fusion360 in Industrial Design. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering 359, 1.
 
48.
Priya, A and Hait, S 2018. Toxicity characterization of metals from various waste printed circuit boards. Process Safety and Environmental Protection 116, 74–81.
 
eISSN:2450-8594
ISSN:2080-5187
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top