ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Retention of Afforestation Areas as Part of Flood Protection - Research Site and Methodology for Headwater Watershad in Poland / Retencja Leśna Zlewni Jako Element Ochrony Przeciwpowodziowej
 
More details
Hide details
1
Institute of Meteorology and Water Management - National Research Institute, Parkowa st 30, 51-616 Wrocław, Poland
 
 
Online publication date: 2016-04-29
 
 
Publication date: 2016-03-01
 
 
Civil and Environmental Engineering Reports 2016;20(1):59-70
 
KEYWORDS
ABSTRACT
Land use is considered as a non-structural, ecologically beneficial flood protection measure. Forest as one of the land use types has many useful applications which can be observed in detail on www.nwrm.eu website project. It is scientifically proved that afforestation influences flood events with high probability of occurrence. However, it is still to be argued how to measure land use impact on the hydrological response of watershed and how it should be measured in an efficient and quantifiable way. Having the tool for such an impact measurement, we can build efficient land management strategies. It is difficult to observe the impact of land use on flood events in the field.Therefore, one of the possible solutions is to observe this impact indirectly by means of hydrological rainfall-runoff models as a proxy for the reality. Such experiments were conducted in the past. Our study aims to work on the viability assessment, methodology and tools that allow to observe this impact with use of selected hydrological models and readily available data in Poland. Our first reaserch site is located within headwaters of the Kamienna river watershed. This watershed has been affected by ecological disaster, which resulted in loss of 65% of forest coverage. Our proposed methodology is to observe this transformation and its effect on the watershed response to heavy precipitation and therefore change in the flood risk.
 
REFERENCES (29)
1.
Kerstin, F., et al. The Vulnerability Sourcebook: Concept and guidelines for standardised vulnerability. Bonn and Eschborn : Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit (GIZ) GmbH,, 2014.
 
2.
Dumieński, G., Pasiecznik-Dominiak, A. and Tiukało, A. Społecznoekonomiczna ocena zagrożenia powodziowego gmin w Polsce. [book auth.] Katarzyny Piekarskiej i Bartosza Kaźmierczaka Praca zbiorowa pod red. Andrzeja Kotowskiego. Interdyscyplinarne zagadnienia w inżynierii i ochronie środowiska. Tom 6. Wrocław : Oficyna Wydawnicza Politechniki Wrocławskiej, 2015, pp. 100-125.
 
3.
IPCC, et al. Summary for policymakers. In: Climate Change 2014: Impacts, Adaptation, and Vulnerability. Cambridge, New York : Cambridge University Press, 2014.
 
4.
Holling, C.S. Resilience and stability of ecological systems. Annual Review of Ecological Systems. 4, , 1973, s. 390-405.
 
5.
Parry, M.L., et al. Contribution of Working Group II to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge and New York : Cambridge University Press, 2007.
 
6.
2001, Commission Communication of 15 May. A Sustainable Europe for a Better World: A European Union Strategy for Sustainable Development’ (Commission proposal to the Gothenburg European Council . [COM(2001) 264 final - not published in the Official Journal]. http://eurlex.europa.eu/legal-..., 2001.
 
7.
Union, European. Natural Water Retention Measures. European Union : s.n., 2014. ISBN: 978-92-79-44497-5.
 
8.
Ministerstwo, Środowiska. POLITYKA EKOLOGICZNA PAŃSTWA W LATACH 2009-2012 Z PERSPEKTYWĄ DO ROKU 2016 . Warszawa : s.n., 2008.
 
9.
EU. Natural Water Retention Measures. Luxemburg : Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, 2014.
 
10.
Verbeirena, B., et al. Assessing urbanisation effects on rainfall-runoff using a remote sensing supported modelling strategy. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF APPLIED EARTH OBSERVATION AND GEOINFORMATION. 21, 2013, 92-102.
 
11.
Banasik, K. Wpływ zagospodarowania terenu na odpływ i transport fluwialny w małych zlewniach zurbanizowanych. Warszawa : Wydawnictwo SGGW, 2009.
 
12.
Guillemette, F., et al. Rainfall generated storm-flow response to clearcutting a boreal forest: peak flow comparision with 50 world-wide basin studies. Journal of Hydrology. 302, 2005, 167-153.
 
13.
Grant, G., et al. Effects of Forest Practices on Peak Flows and Consequent Channel Response: A State-of-Science Re-port for Western Oregon and Washington. s.l. : United States Department of Agriculture, 2008.
 
14.
Alila, Y., et al. Forests and floods: A new paradigm sheds light on age-old controversies. WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH,. 45, 2009, Vol. W08416.
 
15.
Seibert, J. and McDonnell, J. Land-cover impacts on streamflow: a changedetection modelling approach that incorporates parameter uncertainty. Hydrological Science Journal. 55, 2010, Vol. 3, 316-332.
 
16.
Beven, K. Uniqueness of place and process representations in hydrological modelling. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences. 4, 2000, 203-213.
 
17.
McDonnell, J., et al. Moving beyond heterogeneity and process complexity: A new vision for watershed hydrology. Water Resour. Res. 43, 2007, Vol. W07301, doi:10.1029/2006WR005467.
 
18.
Fenicia, F., et al. Catchment properties, function, and conceptual model representation: is there a correspondence? Hydrological Processes. 28, 2014, 2451-2467 DOI: 10.1002/hyp.9726.
 
19.
Plate, E. Classification of hydrological models for flood management. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 2009, Vol. 13, 1939-1951.
 
20.
Jajarmizadeh, M., Harun, S. and Salarpour, M. A Review on Theoretical Consideration and Types of Models in Hydrology. Journal of Environmental Science and Technology. 5, 2012, 249-261.
 
21.
J.C., Refsgaard. and Knudsen, J. Operational validation and intercomparison of different types of hydrological. Water Resources Research. 32, 1996, Vol. 7, 2189-2202.
 
22.
Gao, H., et al. Testing the realism of a topography-driven model (FLEXTopo) in the nested catchments of the Upper Heihe, China. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 18, 2014, Vol. 18, 1895-1915.
 
23.
Euser, T., et al. A framework to assess the realism of model structures using hydrological signatures. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 2013, Vol. 17, 1893-1912.
 
24.
Szalińska, W., et al. Środowisko obliczeniowe operacyjnego modelu typu opad-odpływ. . Monografie KGW PAN. Z. XX, 2014, Vols. s. 293-307, ISSN 0867-7816.
 
25.
Beven, K.J. and Kirkby, M.J. A physically based variable contributing area model of basin hydrology. Hydrologic Science Bulletin. 24, 1979, Vol. 1, 43-69.
 
26.
Savenije, H.H.G. Topography driven conceptual modelling (FLEX-Topo). Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 14, 2010, Vols. doi:10.5194/hess-14-2681-2010, 2681-2692.
 
27.
Bergström, S. The HBV model - its structure and applications. SMHI Hydrology. RH No.4, 1992, 35 pp.
 
28.
VAN DER KNIJFF, J.M., YOUNIS, J. and DE ROO, A.P.J. LISFLOOD: a GIS-based distributed model for river basin scale water balance and flood simulation. International Journal of Geographical Information Science. No. 2, 2010, Vols. Vol. 2, DOI: 10.1080/13658810802549154, 189-212 .
 
29.
WFLOW platform documentation. http://wflow.readthedocs.org/e.... [Online] Accessible in February 2016.
 
eISSN:2450-8594
ISSN:2080-5187
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top