ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Seismic Performance Evaluation of a Proposed Buckling-Restrained Brace for RC-MRFS
 
More details
Hide details
1
Karunya Institute of Technology and Sciences, Coimbatore, India
 
2
Graduate University of Advanced Technology, Kerman, Iran
 
3
Indian Institute Technology, New Delhi, India
 
4
National Institute Technology, Srinagar, J&K, India
 
 
Online publication date: 2019-12-21
 
 
Publication date: 2019-09-01
 
 
Civil and Environmental Engineering Reports 2019;29(3):164-173
 
KEYWORDS
ABSTRACT
This paper presents a novel buckling-restrained brace (BRB) where the inner core is restrained by a concrete infilled Expanded Polystyrene Sheet (EPS) instead of the conventional concrete infilled tube section, to resist inner core buckling. It serves two purposes, firstly, the EPS is a ductile material, which is favourable in terms of seismic performance and, secondly, the outer construction material has better corrosion resistance. Thus, the life of the steel core can be prolonged. In this study, 6 BRB specimens were prepared, of which 3 BRB specimens were infilled with concrete and the remaining 3 BRB specimens with concrete and EPSs, in order to study their performance under cyclic loading. Three different core heights, all with the same core thickness, were adopted. The test results indicate that the load-carrying capacity of this novel BRB is higher than the conventional BRB. Further, the length of the steel tube also affects the strength of the seismic disaster mitigation system. Lastly, a numerical study on a single bay RC frame, with and without BRB subjected to time history analysis, was conducted to check the global performance of this novel system. It was found that the structural responses had substantially decreased.
 
REFERENCES (12)
1.
Guo, LH, Jia, MM, Li, R and Zhang, SM 2013. Hysteretic analysis of thin steel plate shear walls, Int. J. Steel Structures”, Vol. 13, No. 1, 163–174.
 
2.
Ji, XD, Cheng, XW, Jia, XF and Varma, AH. 2017. Cyclic in-plane shear behaviour of double-skin composite walls in high-rise buildings, Journal of Structural Engineering, Vol. 143, No. 6.
 
3.
Han, LH, Li, YJ and Liao, FY 2011. Concrete-filled double skin steel tubular (CFDST) columns subjected to long-term sustained loading, Thin Walled Structure, Vol. 49, No. 12, 1534–1543.
 
4.
Yang, YL, Wang, YY, Fu, F and Liu, JC 2015. Static behaviour of T-shaped concrete-filled steel tubular columns subjected to concentric and eccentric compressive loads, Thin-Walled Structure, Vol. 95, 374–388.
 
5.
Wang, YY, Chen, P, Liu, CY and Zhang, Y 2017. Size effect of circular concrete-filled steel tubular short columns subjected to axial compression, Thin-Walled Structure, Vol. 120, 397–407.
 
6.
Black, CJ, Makris, N and Aiken, ID 2004. Component testing seismic evaluation and characterization of buckling-restrained braces, Journal of Structural Engineering (ASCE), Vol. 130, No. 6, 880–894.
 
7.
Amiria, J, Vaseghi, A, Mirza Goltabar Rowshana and Shafiei Seifabadi, H 2013. Effect of the height increasing on steel buildings retrofitted by buckling restrained bracing systems and TTD damper, International Journal of Engineering, Vol. 26, 1145-1154.
 
8.
Sahoo, DR. and Chao, S-H 2010. Performance-based plastic design method for buckling-restrained braced frames, Engineering Structures, Vol. 32, No. 9, 2950-2958.
 
9.
Jia, MM, Guo, LH and Lu, DG 2014. Performance testing and comparison of buckling-restrained braces with h and crisscross cross-section unrestrained segments, Int. J. Steel Structures, Vol. 14, No. 9, 745–753.
 
10.
Chou, CC and Chen, SY 2010. Sub-assemblage tests and finite element analyses of sandwiched buckling-restrained braces, Engineering Structures, Vol. 32, No. 8, 2108–2121.
 
11.
Jia, MM, Yu, XH, Lu, DG and Lu, BB 2017. Experimental research of assembled buckling restrained braces wrapped with carbon or basalt fiber, J. Constr. Steel Research, Vol. 131, 144–161.
 
12.
Akcelyan, Sarven, Dimitrios G. Lignos, and Tsuyoshi Hikino 2018. Adaptive numerical method algorithms for nonlinear viscous and bilinear oil damper models subjected to dynamic loading, Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, Vol. 113, 488-502.
 
eISSN:2450-8594
ISSN:2080-5187
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top