ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Seismic Vulnerability and Rehabilitation Strategies for Industrial RC Structures
More details
Hide details
1
School of Ocean and Civil Engineering, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, China
Submission date: 2024-05-03
Final revision date: 2024-10-11
Acceptance date: 2024-10-18
Online publication date: 2024-11-19
Publication date: 2024-11-19
Corresponding author
Kamal Hosen
School of Ocean and Civil Engineering, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, 800 Dongchuan Road, 200240, Shanghai, China
Civil and Environmental Engineering Reports 2024;34(4):328-343
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
The catastrophic impact of building collapses or severe structural damage during significant earthquakes has led to considerable economic losses, serious injuries, and tragic loss of life. Retrofitting has emerged as a globally recognized solution, particularly for critical structures such as historical buildings and aging constructions that have experienced degradation over time. Unlike traditional repair and rehabilitation methods, retrofitting offers a more effective and practical approach, markedly enhancing the strength, resilience, and overall lifespan of structures. This paper provides a detailed investigation of seismic retrofitting techniques, with a particular focus on reinforced concrete (RC) industrial buildings, which constitute a substantial portion of the existing built environment. The study delves into various retrofitting methods, categorized primarily into two groups: concrete column jacketing, which bolsters the durability and load-bearing capacity of columns, and steel bracing, which enhances structural performance against lateral loads. These techniques are essential for maintaining the safety and integrity of structures, especially in regions prone to seismic activity. By addressing structural vulnerabilities, these retrofitting strategies significantly reduce the risk of catastrophic failures and bolster community resilience. This research offers valuable insights into the field of structural engineering and disaster resilience planning, highlighting the importance of understanding and applying these strategies. Through informed implementation, engineers and policymakers can improve the seismic resilience of existing buildings, thereby mitigating the detrimental effects of earthquakes on both human life and infrastructure.
REFERENCES (43)
1.
Souhaibou, A and Li L 2023. A comparative study on the lateral displacement of a multi-story RC building under wind and earthquake load actions using base shear method and ETABS software. Materials Today Proceedings. doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2023.04.287.
2.
Sarraz, A, Ali, M and Das, D 2015. Seismic Vulnerability Assessment of Existing Building Stocks at Chandgaon in Chittagong City, Bangladesh. American Journal of Civil Engineering 3, 1-8. doi: 10.11648/j.ajce.20150301.11.
3.
Sadat, M, Huq, M and Ansary M 2010. Seismic vulnerability assessment of buildings of Dhaka City. IEB, Journal of Civil Engineering 38, 159-172.
4.
Gara, N and Agarwal, P 2016. Seismic Retrofitting of Structures by Steel Bracings. Procedia Engineering 144, 1364 – 1372. doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2016.05.166.
5.
Shehab, H, Eisa, A, Wahba, A, Sabol, P and Katunsky, D 2023. Strengthening of Reinforced Concrete Columns Using Ultra-High Performance Fiber-Reinforced Concrete Jacket. Buildings 13, 2036. doi.org/10.3390/buildings13082036.
6.
Frangou, M, Pilakoutas, K and Dritsos, S 1995. Structural repair/strengthening of RC columns. Construction and building materials 9, 259-266. doi.org/10.1016/0950-0618(95)00013-6.
7.
Yu, X, Ji, T and Zheng, T 2015. Relationships between internal forces, bracing patterns and lateral stiffnesses of a simple frame. Engineering Structures 89, 147-161. doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2015.01.030.
8.
Ghobarah, A and Elfath, H 2001. Rehabilitation of a reinforced concrete frame using eccentric steel bracing. Engineering Structures 23, 745-755. doi.org/10.1016/S0141-0296(00)00100-0.
9.
Maheri, M and Hadjipour, A 2003. Experimental investigation and design of steel brace connection to RC frame. Engineering Structures 25, 1707-1714. doi.org/10.1016/S0141-0296(03)00162-7.
10.
Javanmardi, M, and Maheri, M 2017. Anisotropic Damage Plasticity Model for Concrete and Its Use in Plastic Hinge Relocation in RC Frames with FRP. Structures 12, 212-226. doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2017.09.009.
11.
Maheri, M and Akbari, R 2003. Seismic behaviour factor, R, for steel X-braced and knee-braced RC buildings. Engineering Structures 25, 1505-1513, 2003. doi.org/10.1016/S0141-0296(03)00117-2.
12.
Niroomandi, A, Maheri, A, Maheri, M and Mahini, S 2010. Seismic performance of ordinary RC frames retrofitted at joints by FRP sheets. Engineering Structures 32, 2326-2336. doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2010.04.008.
13.
Wang, H, Sun, B and Chen, H 2022. Performance-based seismic evaluation and practical retrofit techniques for buildings in China. Earthquakes and Structures 22, 487-502. dx.doi.org/10.12989/eas.2022.22.5.487.
14.
Julio, E, Branco, F and Silva, V 2005. Reinforced Concrete Jacketing – Interface Influence on Monotonic Loading Response. ACI Structural Journal 102, 252-257. doi: 10.14359/14276.
15.
Formisano, A, Iaquinandi, A and Mazzolani, M 2014. Seismic Retrofitting by FRP of a School Building Damaged by Emilia-Romagna Earthquake. Key Engineering Materials 624, 106-113. doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.624.106.
16.
Ramírez, J 1996 Ten concrete column repair methods. Construction and Building Materials 10, 195-202. doi.org/10.1016/0950-0618(95)00087-9.
17.
Vandoros, K and Dritsos, S 2008. Concrete jacket construction detail effectiveness when strengthening RC columns. Construction and Building Materials 22, 264-276. doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2006.08.019.
18.
Natraj, K, Kirthiga, R and Elavenil, S 2023. Structural performance of RCC building and strengthening the structural members with CFRP. Materials Today 84, 24-32. doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2023.04.304.
19.
Krainskyi, P, Blikharskiy, Z and Khmil, R 2015. Experimental Investigation of Reinforced Concrete Columns Strengthened By Jacketing. Journal of Multidisciplinary Engineering Science and Technology 2, 1959-1963.
20.
Stelios, A 2023. Seismic Retrofit of Existing Reinforced Concrete Buildings. USA: John Wiley & Sons Ltd. doi:10.1002/9781119987352.
21.
Rahimi, A and Maheri, M 2020. The effects of steel X-brace retrofitting of RC frames on the seismic performance of frames and their elements. Engineering Structures 2006, 110149. doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2019.110149.
22.
Javadi, P, Askari, M, Vahedi, S, Hesami, A and Tizchang A 2023. Retrofit of RC buildings using vertical shear links and hybrid connections. Structures 48, 1788-1807. doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2023.01.015.
23.
Zhang, Y, Deng, Y, Li, T and Dong, Z 2021. Strengthening of flexure-dominate RC columns with ECC jackets: Experiment and analysis. Engineering Structures 231, 111809. doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2020.111809.
24.
Lu, W and Phillips B, 2022. A fundamental-period-preserving seismic retrofit methodology for low-rise buildings with supplemental inerters. Engineering Structures 266, 114583. doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2022.114583.
25.
Pugliese, F and Sarno, L 2022. Probabilistic structural performance of RC frames with corroded smooth bars subjected to near- and far-field ground motions. Journal of Building Engineering 49, 104008. doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2022.104008.
26.
Du, K, Cheng, F, Bai, J and Jin, S 2020. Seismic performance quantification of buckling-restrained braced RC frame structures under near-fault ground motions. Engineering Structures 211, 110447. doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2020.110447.
27.
Sayed, A, Rashwan, M and Helmy, M 2020. Experimental Behavior of Cracked Reinforced Concrete Columns Strengthened with Reinforced Concrete Jacketing. Materials 13, 2831. doi.org/10.3390/ma13122832.
28.
Ayar, A and Fizan, A 2024. Seismic Response History Analysis of RC Frame Building with Different Position of Shear Walls by using ETABS. Journal of Mechanical, Civil and Industrial Engineering 5, 01-09. doi.org/10.32996/jmcie.2024.5.2.1.
29.
Raja, D and Rani, N 2023. Analysis of progressive collapse of building using ETABS. Materialstoday: Proceedings 93, 278-286. doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2023.07.257.
30.
Syed, E and Manzoor, K 2022. Analysis and design of buildings using Revit and ETABS software. Materialstoday: Proceedings 65, 1478-1485. doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2022.04.463.
31.
Conroy, K and Tumialan, G 2015. Structural Repair of a Concrete Parking Garage Structure Using ACI 562. Forensic Engineering, 20-29. doi.org/10.1061/9780784479711.003.
32.
Hossain, M, Podder, S, Hasan, M and Momin, M 2022. Evaluation of RC building under seismic load based on BNBC 2006 and BNBC 2020 using Equivalent Static Force (ESF) Method. Journal of Civil and Construction Engineering 8, 6-16. doi.org/10.46610/jocce.2022.v08i03.002.
33.
Moolchandani, K and Sharma, A 2023. Evaluating the Elastic Constants of Concrete, Modified with Fly Ash and Marble Waste, and Their Effects on High-Rise Buildings Using ETABS Software. Sustainability 15, 14743. doi.org/10.3390/su152014743.
34.
Lavendra, S, Kumar, P and Raghavendra, T 2021. Progressive Collapse Behaviour Assessment of Steel Frame Structures – A Review. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, England.
35.
Kiakojouri, F, Zeinali, E, Adam J and Biagi V 2023. Experimental studies on the progressive collapse of building structures: A review and discussion on dynamic column removal techniques. Structures 57, 105059. doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2023.105059.
36.
AISC 2016. ANSI/AISC 360-16 Specification for structural steel buildings. American Institute of Steel Construction, USA.
37.
Kim, S, Han, D and Kim, K 2021. Evaluation of Shear Effect on Deflection of RC Beams. Applied Sciences 11, 7690. doi.org/10.3390/app11167690.
38.
ACI Committee 2019. Building Code Requirements for Structural Concrete (ACI 318-19) and Commentary (ACI 318R-19). American Concrete Institute, Farmington Hills, MI, USA.
39.
Yuan, M, Tuken, A and Sezen, H 2019. A simplified method for evaluation of seismic displacement of reinforced concrete frame buildings. Journal of Structural Integrity and Maintenance 4, 51-57. doi.org/10.1080/24705314.2019.1603190.
40.
Amer, H and Shilpa, P 2018. Effect of soil condition on seismic response of isolated base buildings. International Journal of Advanced Structural Engineering 10, 249–261. doi.org/10.1007/s40091-018-0195-z.
41.
Lee, C and Jeon, J 2022. Drift limit state predictions of rectangular reinforced concrete columns with superelastic shape memory alloy rebars. Journal of Building Engineering 54, 104546. doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2022.104546.
42.
Singh, L, Singh, H and Kaur, I 2023. Nonlinear time history analysis on irregular RC building on sloping ground. Innovative Infrastructure Solutions 85. doi.org/10.1007/s41062-023-01049-1.
43.
Wu, S, He, H, Cheng, S and Chen, Y 2021. Story stiffness optimization of frame subjected to earthquake under uniform displacement criterion. Structural & Multidisciplinary Optimization 63, 1533–1546. doi.org/10.1007/s00158-020-02761-7.