ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Shaping Sustainable Urban Spaces: Understanding Green Space User Needs in Malaysia
More details
Hide details
1
Centre for Real Estate Studies (UTM CRES), Institute for Smart Infrastructure & Innovative Construction (ISiiC), Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, Johor, Malaysia
2
Department of Real Estate Management, Faculty of Technology Management and Business, Universiti Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia, Johor, Malaysia, Malaysia
Submission date: 2024-11-30
Final revision date: 2025-02-06
Acceptance date: 2025-02-09
Online publication date: 2025-03-09
Publication date: 2025-03-09
Corresponding author
Umi Syahiidah Suhaidi
Faculty of Built Environment and Surveying, Centre for Real Estate Studies (UTM CRES), Institute for Smart Infrastructure & Innovative Construction (ISiiC), Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310, Johor Bahru, Malaysia
Civil and Environmental Engineering Reports 2025;35(2):1-14
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
Urban regeneration aims to create vibrant, sustainable, and inclusive urban areas. In this context, this study investigates user preferences for green retail space in Johor Bahru, focusing on activities and facilities required for an enhanced experience. Based on 400 questionnaires analyzed through descriptive statistics, relative importance index, and cross-tabulation, the results reveal that social interaction is the most preferred activity, followed by exercising, stress relief, education, and relaxation through nature appreciation, while recreational activities are the least favored. Demographic factors, such as gender, age, and education level, do not significantly influence activity preferences. Users highlight the need for comfortable seating, shelter, drinking water, walking trails, sanitation, security, lighting, air cooling, and charging stations. These findings contribute to the understanding of user needs in urban green spaces and offer practical insights for future design improvements in retail green environments, supporting the goals of urban regeneration.
REFERENCES (43)
1.
Giorgio, F, Angelo, B, and Vittoria, MM 2022. Green Space for health promotion. Journal of Advanced Health Care 4, 5–12.
2.
Kotler, P and Keller, KL 2016. Marketing Management (15th ed.). Pearson Education.
3.
Nath, TK, Han, SSZ and Lechner, AM 2018. Urban green space and well-being in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening 36, 34–41.
4.
Aziz, NAA, Mokhtar, MDM, Raman, TL, Saikim, FH, and Nordin, NM 2020. Use of urban green spaces: a case study in Taman Merdeka, Johor Bahru. Alam Cipta, 13(2), 54–60.
5.
Suhaidi, US, and Adi Maimun, NH 2023. Harvesting High-Rises: A Comprehensive review of urban farming practice and impacts in Malaysian buildings. Asian Journal of Research in Education and Social Sciences, 5(1), 2015-215.
6.
Razali, IAKM and Shukor, SFA 2022. Comparison of Malaysian Urban Green Spaces Use Prior and During The Covid-19 Pandemic and Preferences for Post-Pandemic Design Improvements. Planning Malaysia, 20.
7.
Silva, C, Bernardo, F, Manso, M and Ramos, I 2023. Green spaces over a roof or on the ground, does it matter? The perception of ecosystem services and potential restorative effects. Sustainability 15(6), 5334.
8.
Tan, T 2015. Assessing the significance of environmentally friendly mall from Malaysian mall visitors’ perspective. Pacific Rim Property Research Journal, 21(3), 275–290.
9.
Hami, A, Fazle, F and Emami, F 2016. Factors Affecting People Preferences toward Environment Landscape, Case Study: Shopping Mall in Kuala Lumpur. International Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 5(4), 108–117.
10.
Aziz, NAA 2012. Green space use and management in Malaysia. Forest & Landscape Research, University of Copenhagen, 51.
11.
Dempsey, N, Bramley, G, Power, S and Brown, C 2011. The social dimension of sustainable development: defining urban social sustainability. Sustainable Development, 19(5), 289-300.
12.
Laprise, M, Lufkin, S, and Rey, E 2015. An indicator system for the assessment of sustainability integrated into the project dynamics of regeneration of disused urban areas. Building and Environment, 86, 29-38.
13.
Villagra, P, Rojas, C, Ohno, R, Xue, M and Gomez, K 2014. A GIS-base exploration of the relationships between open space systems and urban form for the adaptive capacity of cities after an earthquake: the cases of two Chilean cities. Applied Geography, 48, 64-78.
14.
Eni, S, Juanil, DM, Hashim, F, Mohamed, TS, Razali, MN, Adi Maimun, NH and Hussain, AH 2019. Formulation of Urban Regeneration Policy Framework in Malaysia (Unpublished NAPREC R&D report number 9/18). Ministry of Finance, Malaysia.
17.
Ibrahim, F, and Hassan, N 2020. Urban Development and Cross-Border Relations: The Case of Johor Bahru and Singapore. Journal of Urban Studies, 45(3), 234–250.
18.
Ismail, S, Ahmad, N, and Yusoff, N 2019. Sustainable Urban Development in Iskandar Malaysia: Challenges and Opportunities. Malaysian Journal of Environmental Management, 12(2), 112–125.
19.
McKiernan, T 2019. The linguistic landscape of a Malaysian border town. English Today, 37(4), 224–235.
20.
Tan, KW, Lim, HS, & Ooi, CH 2022. Green Infrastructure in Urban Johor Bahru: A Pathway to Sustainable Development. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 65(4), 567–582.
22.
Stockdill, R 2020, September 4. Ikea Southeast Asia’s Toppen mall to be ‘heart and hub’ of JB. Inside Retail Asia.
24.
A National Survey on the Use of Medicines (NSUM) 2016. In
http://www.pharmacy.gov.my. Pharmaceutical Services Division, Ministry of Health Malaysia.
25.
Jennings, V and Bamkole, O 2019. The Relationship between Social Cohesion and Urban Green Space: An Avenue for Health Promotion. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 16(3), 452.
26.
Holgate, MK, Jordan, EA, Snaddon, JL and Lock, JE 2017. Developing education practice in urban green spaces. Meliora International Journal of Student Sustainability Research, 1(1).
27.
Wen, C, Albert, C and Von Haaren, C 2018. The elderly in green spaces: Exploring requirements and preferences concerning nature-based recreation. Sustainable Cities and Society, 38, 582–593.
28.
Liu, Q, Luo, S, Shen, Y, Zhu, Z, Yao, X, Li, Q, Tarin, MWK, Zheng, J and Zhuo, Z 2022. Relationships between students’ demographic characteristics, perceived naturalness and patterns of use associated with campus green space, and self-rated restoration and health. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 68, 127474.
29.
Wey, YE, Sarma, V, Lechner, AM and Nath, TK 2022. Malaysians’ perception on the contribution of urban green spaces to the UN sustainable development goals. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 78, 127792.
30.
Kiplagat, AK, Koech, JK, Ng’etich, JK, Lagat, MJ, Khazenzi, JA and Odhiambo, KO 2021. Urban green space characteristics, visitation patterns and influence of visitors’ socio-economic attributes on visitation in Kisumu City and Eldoret Municipality, Kenya. Trees Forests and People, 7, 100175.
31.
Braçe, O, Garrido‐Cumbrera, M and Correa‐Fernández, J 2021. Gender differences in the perceptions of green spaces characteristics. Social Science Quarterly, 102(6), 2640–2648.
32.
Carmona, M and Tiesdell, S 2007. Urban design reader. Architectural Press.
33.
Adhikari, B, Mishra, SR and Dirks, KN 2020. Green space, health, and wellbeing: considerations for South Asia. The Lancet Planetary Health, 4(4), e135–e136.
34.
Williams, TG, Logan, TM, Zuo, CT, Liberman, KD and Guikema, SD 2020. Parks and safety: a comparative study of green space access and inequity in five US cities. Landscape and Urban Planning, 201, 103841.
35.
Kiełek, K 2022. The importance of safety and security in urban space. Humanities & Social Sciences Reviews, 10(6), 21–23.
36.
Francis, J, Wood, LJ, Knuiman, M and Giles-Corti, B 2012. Quality or quantity? Exploring the relationship between Public Open Space attributes and mental health in Perth, Western Australia. Social Science & Medicine, 74(10), 1570–1577.
37.
Maas, J, Van Dillen, SM, Verheij, RA and Groenewegen, PP 2008. Social contacts as a possible mechanism behind the relation between green space and health. Health & Place, 15(2), 586–595.
38.
Kaźmierczak, A 2012. The contribution of local parks to neighbourhood social ties. Landscape and Urban Planning, 109(1), 31–44.
39.
Peters, K, Elands, B and Buijs, A 2009. Social interactions in urban parks: Stimulating social cohesion? Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 9(2), 93–100.
40.
Chiesura, A 2003. The role of urban parks for the sustainable city. Landscape and Urban Planning, 68(1), 129–138.
41.
Soga, M, Gaston, KJ and Yamaura, Y 2016. Gardening is beneficial for health: A meta-analysis. Preventive Medicine Reports, 5, 92–99.
42.
Peschardt, KK, and Stigsdotter, UK 2013. Associations between park characteristics and perceived restorativeness of small public urban green spaces. Landscape and Urban Planning, 112, 26–39.
43.
Van Den Berg, AE, Jorgensen, A and Wilson, ER 2014. Evaluating restoration in urban green spaces: Does setting type make a difference? Landscape and Urban Planning, 127, 173–181.